MHB Outer measure .... Axler, Result 2.14 .... Another Question ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on proving Result 2.14 from Sheldon Axler's "Measure, Integration & Real Analysis," specifically the implication that if the closed interval $$[a, b]$$ is contained within an open interval $$I_1$$, then the length of $$I_1$$ must be at least $$b - a$$. The participants clarify that if $$I_1 = (c, d)$$ with $$c \leq a < b \leq d$$, then the length $$l(I_1) = d - c$$ satisfies the condition $$l(I_1) \geq b - a$$. This proof relies on understanding the definitions of open intervals and outer measure as provided by Axler.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of open and closed intervals in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of outer measure as defined by Sheldon Axler
  • Knowledge of induction principles in mathematical proofs
  • Ability to manipulate inequalities and lengths of intervals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions of outer measure and length of intervals in Axler's "Measure, Integration & Real Analysis"
  • Learn about mathematical induction and its applications in real analysis proofs
  • Explore the properties of open and closed intervals in the context of measure theory
  • Review examples of rigorous proofs involving inequalities and set inclusions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, as well as educators and researchers interested in measure theory and mathematical proofs.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Sheldon Axler's book: Measure, Integration & Real Analysis ... and I am focused on Chapter 2: Measures ...

I need further help with the proof of Result 2.14 ...

Result 2.14 and its proof read as follows
Axler - Result  2.14- outer measure of a closed interval .png
In the above proof by Axler we read the following:

" ... ... To get started with the induction, note that 2.15 clearly implies 2.16 if $$n = 1$$ ... "Can someone please demonstrate rigorously that 2.15 clearly implies 2.16 if $$n = 1$$ ...

... in other words, demonstrate rigorously that $$[a, b] \subset I_1 \Longrightarrow l(I_1) \geq b - a$$ ...
My thoughts ... we should be able to use $$(a, b) \subset [a, b]$$ and the fact that if $$A \subset B$$ then $$\mid A \mid \leq \mid B \mid$$ ... ... ... ... but we may have to prove rigorously that $$\mid (a, b) \mid = b - a$$ but how do we express this proof ...
Help will be much appreciated ... ...

Peter=============================================================================================================

Readers of the above post may be assisted by access to Axler's definition of the length of an open interval and his definition of outer measure ... so I am providing access to the relevant text ... as follows:
Axler - Defn 2.1 & 2.2 .png

Hope that helps ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

Since $I_{1}$ is an open interval containing $[a,b]$, its right endpoint, say $c$, must be larger than $b$ (with infinity being allowed). Similarly, its left endpoint, say $d$, must be less than $a$ (with negative infinity being allowed). Can you proceed from here?
 
GJA said:
Hi Peter,

Since $I_{1}$ is an open interval containing $[a,b]$, its right endpoint, say $c$, must be larger than $b$ (with infinity being allowed). Similarly, its left endpoint, say $d$, must be less than $a$ (with negative infinity being allowed). Can you proceed from here?
Thanks for the help GJA ... appreciate it ... I believe I can now proceed ...

Now ... we wish to show that $$[a, b] \subset I_1 \Longrightarrow l(I_1) \geq b - a$$ ...

... so ... proceed as follows ...

Let $$I_1 = (c, d)$$ where $$c \leq a \lt b \leq d$$ ...

Then $$l(I_1) = d - c \geq b - a$$ ...

Is that correct?

Peter
 
Looks good. Nicely done!
 
As shown by this animation, the fibers of the Hopf fibration of the 3-sphere are circles (click on a point on the sphere to visualize the associated fiber). As far as I understand, they never intersect and their union is the 3-sphere itself. I'd be sure whether the circles in the animation are given by stereographic projection of the 3-sphere from a point, say the "equivalent" of the ##S^2## north-pole. Assuming the viewpoint of 3-sphere defined by its embedding in ##\mathbb C^2## as...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K