Outer measure of a closed interval .... Axler, Result 2.14 ....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of Result 2.14 from Sheldon Axler's book "Measure, Integration & Real Analysis," specifically regarding the outer measure of a closed interval. The proof demonstrates that the inequality ##\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} l(I_k) \geq \sum_{k=1}^n l(I_k) \geq b - a## establishes that the outer measure of the interval ##|[a, b]|## is at least ##b - a##. Key concepts discussed include the definitions of length of an open interval and outer measure, which are crucial for understanding the proof's implications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of outer measure as defined in measure theory.
  • Familiarity with the concept of length of intervals, specifically in the context of real analysis.
  • Knowledge of the properties of infimum and supremum in set theory.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical induction and its application in proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of outer measure in detail, particularly in Axler's "Measure, Integration & Real Analysis."
  • Review the concept of mathematical induction and its use in proving inequalities.
  • Explore the implications of the infimum and supremum in real analysis, focusing on their applications in measure theory.
  • Practice proving similar results involving closed intervals and their measures to solidify understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone studying measure theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those seeking to understand the intricacies of outer measure and its proofs.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
I need help in order to fully understand the proof that | [a, b] | = b - a ... ...
I am reading Sheldon Axler's book: Measure, Integration & Real Analysis ... and I am focused on Chapter 2: Measures ...

I need help with the proof of Result 2.14 ...

Result 2.14 and its proof read as follows:
Axler - Result  2.14- outer measure of a closed interval .png

In the above proof by Axler we read the following:

" ... ... We will now prove by induction on n that the inclusion above implies that ## \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a##This will then imply that ##\sum_{ k = 1 }^{ \infty } l(I_k) \geq \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a##, completing the proof that ##\mid [a, b] \mid \ \geq b - a##. ... ... "Can someone please explain exactly why ##\sum_{ k = 1 }^{ \infty } l(I_k) \ \geq \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a## completes the proof that ##\mid [a, b] \mid \ \geq b - a##. ... ...

Indeed ... can someone please show, formally and rigorously, that ##\sum_{ k = 1 }^{ \infty } l(I_k) \ \geq \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a## implies that ##\mid [a, b] \mid \geq b - a##. ... ...
Help will be much appreciated ... ...

Peter=============================================================================================================

Readers of the above post may be assisted by access to Axler's definition of the length of an open interval and his definition of outer measure ... so I am providing access to the relevant text ... as follows:
Axler - Defn 2.1 & 2.2 .png


Hope that helps ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The author uses the following fact: Let ##A## be a non-empty set and ##b## be a fixed number. If ##a \geq b## for all ##a \in A##, then ##\inf(A) \geq b## (immediate from the definition of infinum: ##b## is a lower bound of ##A##).

In your case, the author shows ##b-a \leq |[a,b]|## by showing that ##b-a \leq \sum_k l(I_k)## for all choices of ##I_k## as in the definition of outer measure.
 
Math_QED said:
The author uses the following fact: Let ##A## be a non-empty set and ##b## be a fixed number. If ##a \geq b## for all ##a \in A##, then ##\inf(A) \geq b## (immediate from the definition of infinum: ##b## is a lower bound of ##A##).

In your case, the author shows ##b-a \leq |[a,b]|## by showing that ##b-a \leq \sum_k l(I_k)## for all choices of ##I_k## as in the definition of outer measure.
Thanks Math_QED ... appreciate your help ...

Still reflecting on what you have written ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K