Overcoming Struggles with Abstract Math: My Personal Experience

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the challenges of mastering abstract mathematics and proofs, contrasting it with applied mathematics such as statistics and calculus. Participants emphasize that abstract math requires a distinct skill set focused on understanding definitions, logic, and pattern recognition. They highlight that proficiency in computational math does not equate to a lack of intelligence and that developing proof-writing skills necessitates dedicated practice. The conversation reassures individuals struggling with abstract concepts that they are not alone and that improvement is achievable through persistence and collaboration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mathematical concepts, including statistics and calculus.
  • Familiarity with mathematical proofs and logical reasoning.
  • Ability to recognize and analyze patterns in mathematical contexts.
  • Experience with collaborative problem-solving in a team environment.
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice writing mathematical proofs to enhance logical reasoning skills.
  • Explore resources on abstract algebra to deepen understanding of mathematical structures.
  • Join a math club or study group to collaborate and share insights on abstract concepts.
  • Investigate online courses focused on proof techniques and abstract mathematics.
USEFUL FOR

Students in engineering or mathematics, educators teaching abstract concepts, and anyone seeking to improve their skills in mathematical proofs and abstract reasoning.

duey07
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm good at math like stats calc and others that r more process based. But I suck at things like abstract math, pure math , proofs etc.

Am I an idiot? I'm OK with being stupid, I know it does not define a persons worth..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To do abstract math and proofs is a very different skill from applied math. It takes understanding definitions and logic and melding them together to make a convincing proof making sure not to make a mistake. It's a lot like playing a game of chess in your head before your opponent has even made his move evaluating different attacks.

Abstract math is also about seeing patterns and then seeing patterns in the patterns and being to use them to find even more patterns. Marhematicians look for the governing rules and then wonder what if this rule didn't apply what would the set look like.

As an example, the set of integers is closed under addition so someone asks what if the numbers were even still closed right what if they were odd oops not closed... So now we know something new and so it goes...
 
jedishrfu said:
To do abstract math and proofs is a very different skill from applied math. It takes understanding definitions and logic and melding them together to make a convincing proof making sure not to make a mistake. It's a lot like playing a game of chess in your head before your opponent has even made his move evaluating different attacks.

Abstract math is also about seeing patterns and then seeing patterns in the patterns and being to use them to find even more patterns. Marhematicians look for the governing rules and then wonder what if this rule didn't apply what would the set look like.

As an example, the set of integers is closed under addition so someone asks what if the numbers were even still closed right what if they were odd oops not closed... So now we know something new and so it goes...
Igj so exp helps?

I
OK so exp helps. But how stupid am I.
Even if I know the subject word problems give trouble
 
I have two thoughts:
1) Math proofs and abstraction can come as a surprise to a lot of people. It takes some time to catch on. There are patterns to proofs and abstractions just as there are patterns to calculations. Don't draw conclusions too early -- you might be the best of us.
2) If you are good at the calculations of statistics and calculus, you are not dumb. I work with some people who whiz through calculations while I am still fumbling around. I am good at other things. I appreciate them and (I think) they appreciate my skills. One of the great pleasures is to work on a team where people have different talents and they combine their skills to produce a superior product.
 
FactChecker said:
I have two thoughts:
1) Math proofs and abstraction can come as a surprise to a lot of people. It takes some time to catch on. There are patterns to proofs and abstractions just as there are patterns to calculations. Don't draw conclusions too early -- you might be the best of us.
2) If you are good at the calculations of statistics and calculus, you are not dumb. I work with some people who whiz through calculations while I am still fumbling around. I am good at other things. I appreciate them and (I think) they appreciate my skills. One of the great pleasures is to work on a team where people have different talents and they combine their skills to produce a superior product.
That's just memorization tho.
 
The thing is that, as mentioned above, proof-based math requires an entirely different set of skills than computational math, which means (Oh joy!) it requires its own, separate many hours of practice.

I was terrible at writing proofs when I was first exposed to them. I'm not a math major (I'm in engineering), but I very much enjoy pure math. After being active in my school's math club, working problems, and reading up on pure math on my own, I eventually got the hang of it, and I'm much more comfortable with the nuances involved in proofs (but I'm far from the best proof writer). Proof writing is a skill that you can practice, just like an instrument or juggling.
 
Not very many people are good with proofs, especially at the beginning.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K