Overcoming Struggles with Abstract Math: My Personal Experience

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges individuals face with abstract mathematics, particularly in understanding proofs and the differences between applied and pure math. Participants share personal experiences and insights regarding the skills required for abstract math and the learning process involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express difficulty with abstract math and proofs, contrasting it with their proficiency in applied math like statistics and calculus.
  • It is suggested that abstract math requires a different skill set, involving understanding definitions, logic, and the ability to see and manipulate patterns.
  • One participant likens the process of creating proofs to playing chess, emphasizing the need for strategic thinking and evaluation of various possibilities.
  • Another participant notes that many people struggle with proofs initially, indicating that this is a common experience rather than a personal failing.
  • Some participants argue that proficiency in calculations does not equate to overall intelligence, highlighting the value of diverse skills in collaborative environments.
  • There is a recognition that proof writing is a skill that can be developed over time with practice, similar to learning an instrument.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that abstract math and proofs are challenging and require different skills compared to applied math. However, there is no consensus on the nature of intelligence or the implications of struggling with these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention that the transition to understanding proofs can take time and that initial struggles are common. There is also a suggestion that the learning process may involve various approaches and personal experiences.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students transitioning from applied math to abstract math, educators looking for insights into student challenges, and individuals interested in the cognitive aspects of learning mathematics.

duey07
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm good at math like stats calc and others that r more process based. But I suck at things like abstract math, pure math , proofs etc.

Am I an idiot? I'm OK with being stupid, I know it does not define a persons worth..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To do abstract math and proofs is a very different skill from applied math. It takes understanding definitions and logic and melding them together to make a convincing proof making sure not to make a mistake. It's a lot like playing a game of chess in your head before your opponent has even made his move evaluating different attacks.

Abstract math is also about seeing patterns and then seeing patterns in the patterns and being to use them to find even more patterns. Marhematicians look for the governing rules and then wonder what if this rule didn't apply what would the set look like.

As an example, the set of integers is closed under addition so someone asks what if the numbers were even still closed right what if they were odd oops not closed... So now we know something new and so it goes...
 
jedishrfu said:
To do abstract math and proofs is a very different skill from applied math. It takes understanding definitions and logic and melding them together to make a convincing proof making sure not to make a mistake. It's a lot like playing a game of chess in your head before your opponent has even made his move evaluating different attacks.

Abstract math is also about seeing patterns and then seeing patterns in the patterns and being to use them to find even more patterns. Marhematicians look for the governing rules and then wonder what if this rule didn't apply what would the set look like.

As an example, the set of integers is closed under addition so someone asks what if the numbers were even still closed right what if they were odd oops not closed... So now we know something new and so it goes...
Igj so exp helps?

I
OK so exp helps. But how stupid am I.
Even if I know the subject word problems give trouble
 
I have two thoughts:
1) Math proofs and abstraction can come as a surprise to a lot of people. It takes some time to catch on. There are patterns to proofs and abstractions just as there are patterns to calculations. Don't draw conclusions too early -- you might be the best of us.
2) If you are good at the calculations of statistics and calculus, you are not dumb. I work with some people who whiz through calculations while I am still fumbling around. I am good at other things. I appreciate them and (I think) they appreciate my skills. One of the great pleasures is to work on a team where people have different talents and they combine their skills to produce a superior product.
 
FactChecker said:
I have two thoughts:
1) Math proofs and abstraction can come as a surprise to a lot of people. It takes some time to catch on. There are patterns to proofs and abstractions just as there are patterns to calculations. Don't draw conclusions too early -- you might be the best of us.
2) If you are good at the calculations of statistics and calculus, you are not dumb. I work with some people who whiz through calculations while I am still fumbling around. I am good at other things. I appreciate them and (I think) they appreciate my skills. One of the great pleasures is to work on a team where people have different talents and they combine their skills to produce a superior product.
That's just memorization tho.
 
The thing is that, as mentioned above, proof-based math requires an entirely different set of skills than computational math, which means (Oh joy!) it requires its own, separate many hours of practice.

I was terrible at writing proofs when I was first exposed to them. I'm not a math major (I'm in engineering), but I very much enjoy pure math. After being active in my school's math club, working problems, and reading up on pure math on my own, I eventually got the hang of it, and I'm much more comfortable with the nuances involved in proofs (but I'm far from the best proof writer). Proof writing is a skill that you can practice, just like an instrument or juggling.
 
Not very many people are good with proofs, especially at the beginning.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
168K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K