MHB Oxidation and reduction question

markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
I am trying to work out which is oxidised and reduced in this reaction2mg + o2 ->2mgo

so the mg has a oxidation number of 2+ and the oxygen has a oxidation number of 3+. I am not sure what the oxidation numbers of magnesium and oxygen are in magnesium oxide as it does not work out and it is not possible going off my initial workings. Any help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
I am trying to work out which is oxidised and reduced in this reaction2mg + o2 ->2mgo

so the mg has a oxidation number of 2+ and the oxygen has a oxidation number of 3+. I am not sure what the oxidation numbers of magnesium and oxygen are in magnesium oxide as it does not work out and it is not possible going off my initial workings. Any help?

Hi marko,

Oxygen has an oxidation number of -2.
MgO is neutral.
Magnesium is oxidized by the oxidizer Oxygen.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi marko,

Oxygen has an oxidation number of -2.
MgO is neutral.
Magnesium is oxidized by the oxidizer Oxygen.
02 has an O.N of 0
2mg has a O.N of +4
in 2mgo the O.N is 2(2) +2(-2)

so i am not sure how mg is loosing electrons.
 
markosheehan said:
02 has an O.N of 0
2mg has a O.N of +4
in 2mgo the O.N is 2(2) +2(-2)

so i am not sure how mg is loosing electrons.

$2 Mg$ is neutral.
It loses 2x2 electrons to yield $2 Mg^{2+}$.
$O_2$ gains 2x2 electrons.
Together they form $2 Mg^{2+}O^{2-}$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top