- 8,213
- 2,651
Another new fire: The Kenneth Fire - the North side of the 101 out by Hidden Hills
Jeeez. Oh man.Flyboy said:https://www.twz.com/air/one-of-just...es-taken-out-of-palisades-fire-fight-by-drone
Well, that’s wonderful
I have seen a number of people like one older couple who evacuated to their daughter's home and lost everything. Then they and their daughter's family had to evacuate and they too lost everything.berkeman said:And to add insult to injury, it looks like there have been several large-scale evacuation orders sent out to people's phones by mistake:
https://www.nbcnews.com/weather/wil...os-angeles-area-millions-residents-rcna187091
Ouch. The good news is that they are starting to get some containment on some of the fires...
Source, please? SCE is denying this, even though people in positions to know the truth (eg, POTUS) keep repeating it.Ivan Seeking said:One reason they lost water in some areas was the loss of power.
I heard they try to fight it, due to the affluent nature of the people who live there.Flyboy said:I still don't understand why people think you can fight these fires directly. Short of a literal tsunami, you cannot place enough water on target to fight something like this. Protect evacuation routes, protect the people getting out, defend critical infrastructure if you feel it's actually defensible without risking the lives of the fire fighters... that's what you can do.
There's a movie I'm fond of that has a memorable line... "There are things you can't fight. Acts of God. You see a hurricane coming? You get out of the way." That's what we're facing here, and trying to protect everything of even moderate importance is going to be a failure. They have to triage and protect what has to be protected, no more. They don't have the equipment, supplies, or manpower to do more.
That said, the aerial fight has been going better than I had dared hope. They put in way more flight time and way more drops than I was expecting today given the weather conditions, and that's going to buy vital time for the folks on the ground.
POTUS and I'm sure other people interviewed. I have heard a number of explanations includinggmax137 said:Source, please? SCE is denying this, even though people in positions to know the truth (eg, POTUS) keep repeating it.
Here in Nevada, the fire fighters always try to defend property (houses, buildings) threatened by wildfire. They don't care if it is a big house or a small ranch house or even a garage. After a fire is contained, I have often seen a single house of building still standing, surrounded by scorched earth. They do this by dropping water all around the structure they're defending. I imagine the same is true in southern Cali. The steep terrain and the 100 mph Santa Anna winds made this impossible in this week's fires, I don't think the income of the residents plays any part in it. In fact, that suggestion is an insult to the fire fighters.MidgetDwarf said:I heard they try to fight it, due to the affluent nature of the people who live there.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/palisades-fire-hydrants-ran-out-of-water/Ivan Seeking said:POTUS and I'm sure other people interviewed. I have heard a number of explanations including
- the loss of power
- the loss of pumping capacity
- depletion of the emergency water storage due to too large of a load on the system.
- There were too many trucks trying to use water - the demand simply exceeded the pump capacity.
- Areas ravaged by fire had uncontrolled leaks spewing water needed to fight the front line.
Note the part, "We also fueled all our generators serving our pump stations..."The LADWP said in an email on Jan. 9: "There is no lack of water flowing through our pipes or flowing to the Palisades area. Water remains available in Palisades, but is limited in areas at elevation, impacting fire hydrants."
According to Quiñones, the department followed emergency procedures ahead of the windstorm that exacerbated the Los Angeles wildfires on Jan. 7. She told reporters on Jan. 8 (at the 27:30 time stamp):
In preparation for the windstorm LADWP activated its emergency preparation plans and filled all 114 available water reservoirs and storage facilities throughout the city including the three 1 million-gallon tanks in the Palisades area. We also fueled all our generators serving our pump stations to ensure water will flow out through the emergency.
I work a lot with FFs, and I'm with gmax on this. FFs don't fight fires based on saving famous people's homes first. Please don't suggest that.MidgetDwarf said:I heard they try to fight it, due to the affluent nature of the people who live there.
I'm inclined to think that POTUS had good sources of information, but this is a counterpoint that I also think is pretty credible:Ivan Seeking said:See the video of Biden explaining that power was turned off to prevent creating more fires
https://thehill.com/video/biden-say...s-led-to-california-water-shortages/10357741/
gmax137 said:
There was a map showing that the fire lines stopped almost exactly where the severe drought area ends.fresh_42 said:I have heard a couple of interesting facts in interviews with experts here. I report what has been said, I cannot provide sources though.
- Rain (if not directly on the flames) and droughts are irrelevant. The hot and dry Santa Ana coming from the desert works like a hair dryer. Any humidity would have been blown away anyway once it is burning - from an interview with a park ranger.
Maybe that would need a closer look at aspects like plantings, constructions, and so on. CNN also showed a map of the Palisades fire that abruptly stopped in a straight line at the county border. So much to their reliability. Or the one south of it, I don't remember exactly. I just wondered about that straight.Ivan Seeking said:There was a map showing that the fire lines stopped almost exactly where the severe drought area ends.
https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/CurrentMap/StateDroughtMonitor.aspx?CA
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/08/us/maps-visuals-los-angeles-wildfires-dg/index.html
I was thinking the factors that drive the drought may also play a role affecting the course of the fire. For example, a mountain ridge or a change in elevation could be factors. Said another way, topology could have played a role in both cases.fresh_42 said:Maybe that would need a closer look at aspects like plantings, constructions, and so on. CNN also showed a map of the Palisades fire that abruptly stopped in a straight line at the county border. So much to their reliability. Or the one south of it, I don't remember exactly. I just wondered about that straight.
And I doubt we are talking about one district. There may be many examples of failures for many reasons.gmax137 said:I think we can agree, that there's a difference between "shutting off power" and "shutting off power to the fire pumps." Especially in light of the statement that the fire pumps have their own generators.
@berkeman makes a good point about not rushing to conclusions.
Rats, I just saw a FF chief interviewed tonight on the "ABC World New Tonight" TV broadcast that said another contributing factor was apartment buildings and businesses in the area with sprinkler systems that had those systems compromised by the intensity of the fire, which resulted in large leaks at each of those sites.berkeman said:I can say from personal experience that when a firefighting engine hooks up to a hydrant in a neighborhood to start pumping water, that the pressure to normal water outlets (like me fighting the neighborhood home fire with a garden hose) tanks to nothing. So it's reasonable that at higher elevations with multiple taps into the water system that the pressure would drop enough to starve those higher hydrants.
Topology is the central key since it explains Santa Ana and windspeed. But the hair dryer effect sounded reasonable to me. South California is dry compared to other regions in any case. The flying sparks are a problem if they land in an urban area whether there was rain in October or not.Ivan Seeking said:And I doubt we are talking about one district. There may be many examples of failures for many reasons.
Absolutely terrifying for all involved. When I compare the area of just one of the fires to where I live, all of metropolitan Detroit would be gon we.Ivan Seeking said:This is looking like a potential catastrophe. Right now the fire is only about five miles from Santa Monica (a major city) and wind gusts as high as 80 mph are expected. This is being driven by the Santa Ana Winds, which are notorious for creating extremely dangerous fire conditions with hot, dry winds that often reach as much as 100 mph.
Parts of Santa Monica are now being evacuated.
View attachment 355499
https://www.latimes.com/california/live/pacific-palisades-fire-updates-los-angeles
Hello Hypatia! Very long time no see. :)hypatia said:Absolutely terrifying for all involved. When I compare the area of just one of the fires to where I live, all of metropolitan Detroit would be gon we.
Not really. There’s lots of reports of then canceling coverage starting months ago, and unconfirmed reports of people getting their coverage cancelled during the evacuations.Ivan Seeking said:Insurance CEOs are probably having heart attacks.