Parachuting inside bales of hay

  • Thread starter Thread starter geoffrey159
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the safety of dropping soldiers inside bales of hay from an altitude of 150 feet during World War II. Using conservation of energy principles, it is determined that the average pressure experienced upon impact is 15.2 lb/in², which is below the survivable threshold of 30 lb/in². The calculations assume a constant force over the impact distance of 2 feet into the snow. While the conclusion suggests that it is 'safe' for soldiers to be dropped in this manner, the discussion acknowledges the unrealistic assumptions made in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles
  • Familiarity with basic physics equations related to motion and impact
  • Knowledge of pressure calculations in lb/in²
  • Basic grasp of the effects of snow on impact forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of impact forces in varying materials, such as snow and water
  • Study the effects of rotational acceleration on impact safety
  • Explore historical military parachuting techniques and safety measures
  • Learn about energy dissipation methods in parachuting and landing scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, military historians, safety engineers, and anyone interested in the mechanics of parachuting and impact safety.

geoffrey159
Messages
535
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


During World War II the Russians, lacking sufficient
parachutes for airborne operations, occasionally dropped soldiers
inside bales of hay onto snow.
The human body can survive an average pressure on impact of
30 lb/in2 . Suppose that the lead plane drops a dummy bale equal
in weight to a loaded one from an altitude of 150 ft, and that the
pilot observes that it sinks about 2 ft into the snow. If the weight of
an average soldier is 144 lb and his effective area is 5 ft2 , is it safe
to drop the men?

Homework Equations


energy conservation

The Attempt at a Solution



For clarity, I set h1 = 150ft, h2 = 2ft, mg = 144lb, and S = 5lb/ft^2.

Using conservation of energy, the paratrooper's speed just before impact is ##v_i = \sqrt{2gh_1}##.

If ## E_r## is the mechanical energy once the paratrooper is at rest 2ft under snow, ##E_i## the mechanical energy at impact, and ##\vec N## the force of snow on man, then:

##
\left\{
\begin{array}{}
E_r = 0\\
E_i = mg (h_1+h_2) \\
E_r - E_i = \int_{\vec r_{impact}}^{\vec r_{rest}} \vec N.d\vec r
\end{array}
\right.
##

And, because the force of the snow is vertical,

## mg(h_1+h_2) = \int_{0}^{h_2} N(y) dy \approx h_2 N_{av} ##

So the average pressure the paratrooper must resist is

##\frac{N_{av}}{S} = 144*152/(2*5) \ lb/ft^2 = 152/(2*5) \ lb/in^2 = 15.2 \ lb/in^2 < 30 \ lb/in^2##

So yes it is 'safe' (non lethal). Is it correct ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Under the (problematic) assumption that the force is constant over the whole length, and if the airplane magically stops in the air, yes.
I'm sure the Russians used a better unit system.[/size]
 
I agree it is not very realistic :-)
Thank you for the reply !
 
mfb said:
Under the (problematic) assumption that the force is constant over the whole length, and if the airplane magically stops in the air, yes.
I'm sure the Russians used a better unit system.
Yes, two good points. The horizontal speed might not be a big deal if the bales are round, though of course that leads to the separate question of how great a rotational acceleration is tolerable.
For the constancy of vertical force, I suspect that depends largely on snow depth. For very deep snow it could be fairly constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K