Mechanics question on dropping soldiers

  • Thread starter Thread starter leyyee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the safety of dropping soldiers from an altitude of 150 ft using a work-energy approach. It references a historical context during World War II where soldiers were dropped in bales of hay onto snow, with specific parameters regarding weight and impact pressure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the work-energy theorem and the conservation of energy principles. Questions arise about the initial and final kinetic energy values being zero, and the relevance of gravitational work in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the energy principles involved, while others seek clarification on specific aspects of the equations and assumptions being made. There is a mix of understanding and confusion regarding the application of the work-energy theorem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the problem's focus on vertical motion and the assumption of zero initial speed for the soldier at the drop point, which may influence the interpretation of kinetic energy values.

leyyee
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



this question is from the book introduction to mechanics.. question 4.12

During the Second World War the Russian, lacking sufficient parachutes for airborne operations, occasionally dropped soldiers inside bales of hay onto snow. The human body can survive an average pressure on impact of 30 lb/in2. Suppose that the lead plane drops a dummy bale equal in weight to a loaded one from an altitude of 150 ft, and that the pilot observes that it sinks about 2 ft into the snow. If the weight of an average soldier is 144 lb and his effective area is 5 ft2, is it safe to drop the men?

Homework Equations



So, I use work-energy theorem to solve it.. but i could not find the later part after this equation..

work-energy equation i got is : Kb-Ka = integration(a,b) (F •dR)

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure whether my work energy equation is correct.. So anyone here would like to help me? sorry for trouble.. thx..
maybe anyone of you guys want to give me some hint on it.. thanks a lot..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a number of ways to solve this problem, but if you use the work energy theorem, you've got to include the work done by gravity also. Also, the work done by the snow on the man can be obtained by its average force times the distance through which it acts..no need to integrate if you don't have to. Rather than get confused by the work-energy approach, you might want to try the conservation of total energy principle (Ka + Ua - W_snow = Kb + Ub), where Ka and Kb =0. Or otherwise, find the man's speed as he hits the ground, then his deceleration over the 2 foot snow pit, then the force acting on him per Newton 2, then the pressure.
 
hey jay thankx.. but i am not really understand why is ka n kb = 0 ?
 
anyone would like to give me some hint on my question ?

y is kb n ka = 0 from the previous.. thx..
 
leyyee said:
anyone would like to give me some hint on my question ?

y is kb n ka = 0 from the previous.. thx..
In the absence of other data, this problem is looking in the vertical Y direction only, and ignoring the horizontal motion of the soldier (he would have an initial speed in the X direction due to the plane's horizontal speed). So, I'm assuming this is like a soldier dropped from a cliff rather than an airplane. Point A is the start point; his vertical initial speed is 0, thus Ka = 0. Point B is the end point at 2 feet below the snow; he comes to a stop at that point, thus his speed is also 0 at that point, and thus Kb=0.
 
wow... i should have thought so..
really thankx for your patience in answering my question..
really thankx a lot.. and i found the answer.. thankx...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
15K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K