Parallax error - what type of error is it?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter skyglow1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Parallax Type
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of parallax error, specifically whether it is a systematic or random error. Participants explore the nature of parallax error in the context of measurement and observation, seeking clarity on its characteristics and implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that parallax error is a systematic error, as it arises from the observer's viewpoint not aligning with the observed object during measurements.
  • Others argue that parallax error is repeatable and can be controlled, suggesting it fits the definition of a systematic error.
  • A later reply questions the definition of systematic error, specifically the idea that it must always result in a fixed amount of error, raising concerns about how parallax error can be consistently repeated across observations.
  • One participant humorously invites the friend questioning the classification to join the discussion directly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that parallax error is a systematic error, but there is disagreement regarding the implications of its repeatability and the definition of systematic error itself.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in the definitions of systematic and random errors, as well as the conditions under which parallax error is observed and measured.

skyglow1
My friends are having an argument as to whether parallax error is systematic or random error. We have tried looking all around in books/internet etc but nothing mentions what type of error it is. Any help would be appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Skyglow;
Welcome to PF. I'm not sure under what circumstances this error is encountered in regard to your question. Parallax simply involves a different viewpoint. If I understand your question correctly, then it is a systematic error, not random. It would mean that the observer and the obsrerved are not in the same spatial relationship during multiple observations.
 
Parallax is a systematic error. It should be very repeatable, and can be eliminated with some care.
 
Agreed. Paralax is not a function of the operation of the experiment. It is an error you usually have control over and can repeat (like Integral mentioned).

Look here: http://www.chem1.com/acad/webtext/matmeasure/mm4.html
note the section on systematic error.
 
Last edited:
Lol my friends not completely satisfied. He asks that if the definition of systematic error is always to be off by a fixed amount, how can you repeat parallax error so that it gives the same amount of error for every reading?
 
With no offence intended, tell your friend to register his ass on here and question us himself. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K