Parallax Limitations: Measuring Distances Miles Away

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nmsurobert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallax
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the limitations of measuring distances using parallax techniques in an educational setting. The participants emphasize the necessity of a wider baseline for accurate measurements, particularly when attempting to measure objects several miles away, such as mountain peaks. They suggest using a protractor and measuring tools like a measuring tape, while also noting that visibility and resolution are critical factors. The consensus is that for effective measurements, students should ideally work within a confined space with unobstructed views, and the measurements should be limited to distances within 60 meters for practical accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parallax and its application in distance measurement
  • Familiarity with basic geometry, specifically angles and triangles
  • Experience using measuring tools such as protractors and measuring tapes
  • Knowledge of visual acuity and its impact on measurement accuracy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical principles of parallax and its limitations in distance measurement
  • Explore techniques for enhancing measurement accuracy using tools like digital cameras and software
  • Investigate the effects of visual acuity on parallax measurements and how to account for them
  • Learn about alternative methods for measuring long distances in astronomy, such as triangulation
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy educators, physics teachers, and students interested in practical applications of parallax for distance measurement in a classroom setting.

nmsurobert
Messages
288
Reaction score
36
I'm setting up a lab for my astro students relating to parallax. We will be using some pretty simple tools. Measuring tape and a protractor with a straw fastened to it. I know that calculating distances with tools like these work in the classroom but what if I wanted to calculate the distances of something that was several miles away. Like, a mountain peak. Would this still work?
I haven't attempted to do it myself. I thought I would ask before I went through the trouble of trying to set this up only find out that it doesn't work out or that I'm missing something. I know that the baseline has to be wider. For something across the room, a baseline of 9 ft will do. But I imagine that wouldn't work for something that is ten miles away. The angle would be too narrow. Is there ratio that exists for how wide a base line should be for a certain distance? Any feedback would be helpful. Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You should be able to do tte math, but maybe try with a map to see what would be minimum distance to get a decent angle difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nmsurobert
scottdave said:
You should be able to do tte math, but maybe try with a map to see what would be minimum distance to get a decent angle difference.
Now that I read your post, doing the math should be pretty simple lol. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
You must have a mountain 10 miles away. Use that as the non-varying background. Find a point source feature on the mountain, probably the peak but could be any spot that is easy to describe and less than 1 arcminute diameter. Compare that point to Andromeda galaxy or Deneb. Use a flag pole, goal posts, power line pole or a pointed building feature(antenna, steeple etc) as the object you are measuring the distance to.

It might be better to remain confined to the classroom. That forces the idea that you can only make your measurement inside a confined spread. You would need an upper floor room with windows and an unobstructed view of the horizon. You have a 4 meter spread in the windows so you get a 2 meter astronomical unit equivalent. A parsec equivalent is around 400km away. An object 7 km away should have less than 1 minute of arc paralax. That is the limit for 6/6 (20/20) vision. So no student with 6/6 vision or worse could see any change in a 7km object even if they had tools that sensitive enough to measure minutes of arc. Using a protractor and the window frame is unlikely to get better than single digit degrees. So your foreground objects should be within tan 1°, within 60 meters of the windows.

You could have them do the measurements at the windows but do them yourself with similar tools and a camera. Draw the protractor into the images on your computer. That gives you a printout with a measurement so you can test if a student can calculate the distance when given a specific angle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and scottdave
Like @stefan r pointed out, the resolution of measurement will be a limiting factor. Nice walkthrough.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K