Parallel transport of tangent vector....(geodesic)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of parallel transport of tangent vectors along curves, specifically in the context of geodesics in different coordinate systems. Participants explore the implications of tangent vectors in 2-D Cartesian and polar coordinates, questioning whether certain curves can be classified as geodesics based on the behavior of their tangent vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that in a 2-D Cartesian coordinate system, any curve has tangent vectors that are parallelly transported, suggesting all such curves are geodesics.
  • Another participant counters that only straight lines in flat space parallel transport their tangent vectors, questioning the reasoning behind the claim that curved paths do so.
  • Several participants clarify that tangent vectors point along the curve itself, not along the coordinate axes, challenging the initial assertion about the nature of tangent vectors.
  • Illustrations are referenced to explain parallel transport, indicating that if the parallel-transported tangent vector at one point does not equal the tangent vector at another point, the curve is not a geodesic.
  • There is acknowledgment of misunderstanding regarding the definition of tangent vectors and their relation to the curve.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the classification of curves as geodesics based on the behavior of tangent vectors. There is no consensus on the initial claim that all curves in Cartesian coordinates are geodesics, as multiple viewpoints and clarifications are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of understanding the definition of tangent vectors and their relationship to the curves, indicating that misconceptions may arise from conflating tangent vectors with coordinate axes.

Apashanka
Messages
427
Reaction score
15
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...Vaw3UvOQyTwkcG7c7yKkYbjSp&cshid=1551081845109
Here in page 55 it is written that geodesic is a curve whose tangent vector is parallely transported along the curve.
Now if there is a curve in 2-D which is determined by λ(length along the curve) .In 2-D cartesian coordinate system the tangent vector at every λ will point along the x(unit) and y(unit) direction that means they are parallely transported along the curve that means any curve in 2-D cartesian coordinate system is a geodesic.
But the same curve in 2-D polar coordinate (r,θ) ,at each λ the tangent vector points along the r(unit) and θ(unit) which differs along the curve ,that is the same curve is not a geodesic in 2-D polar coordinate system ,is it so??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Parallel transport means, loosely, that you move a vector along some path while keeping it pointing in the same direction. In Euclidean space, only straight lines have a tangent vector that, moved along the line and kept pointing in the same direction, remains a tangent vector. As a counter example, imagine a circular path. At some point the tangent points in the +x direction. Parallel transport it a quarter of the way round the circle. The vector still points in the +x direction, but the tangent vector here is in the +y direction.

Coordinates are irrelevant to this fact. The additional complexity in curved spacetime is in the definition of "pointing in the same direction". That's handled by the connection coefficients.
 
Apashanka said:
In 2-D cartesian coordinate system the tangent vector at every λ will point along the x(unit) and y(unit) direction that means they are parallely transported along the curve that means any curve in 2-D cartesian coordinate system is a geodesic.
This is not correct. In flat space only straight lines parallel transport their tangent vector. I am not sure exactly why you would think that curved paths parallel transport their tangent vector. Could you explain your reasoning?
 
Dale said:
This is not correct. In flat space only straight lines parallel transport their tangent vector. I am not sure exactly why you would think that curved paths parallel transport their tangent vector. Could you explain your reasoning?
IMG_20190225_142030.jpg

Here V1 and V2 are the tangent vectors at every λ which point along x(unit) and y(unit) throughout the curve which means they are parallel transported... that's why I am saying.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20190225_142030.jpg
    IMG_20190225_142030.jpg
    30.3 KB · Views: 624
Apashanka said:
Here V1 and V2 are the tangent vectors at every λ which point along x(unit) and y(unit)

You are mistaken about what tangent vectors are. Tangent vectors point along the curve. They don't point along the coordinate axes.
 
Apashanka said:
Here V1 and V2 are the tangent vectors
Oh, there is the mistake. Neither V1 nor V2 are tangent vectors to this curve. The tangent vectors would point diagonally along the curve.

A tangent vector can be thought of as being formed by taking two points on the curve, say ##(x(\lambda),y(\lambda))## and ##(x(\lambda+\Delta \lambda),y(\lambda+\Delta \lambda))##, drawing the line connecting those two points, and taking the limit as ##\Delta \lambda## goes to 0. V1 and V2 do not fit that description.
 
Dale said:
Oh, there is the mistake. Neither V1 nor V2 are tangent vectors to this curve.
Yes sir I got it now they are the components...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
PeterDonis said:
You are mistaken about what tangent vectors are. Tangent vectors point along the curve. They don't point along the coordinate axes.
Yes sir I got it now they are only the components...
 
Apashanka said:
Yes sir I got it now they are the components...
For this case at any λ the tangent vector points in dx(λ)/dλ##\hat x##+dy(λ)/dλ##\hat y##
 
  • #10
Apashanka said:
For this case at any λ the tangent vector points in dx(λ)/dλ##\hat x##+dy(λ)/dλ##\hat y##
Yes, that is correct
 
  • #11
PeterDonis said:
You are mistaken about what tangent vectors are. Tangent vectors point along the curve. They don't point along the coordinate axes.
IMG_20190225_153523.jpg

Here T (tangent vector) is not pointing along the curve??
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20190225_153523.jpg
    IMG_20190225_153523.jpg
    41.2 KB · Views: 916
  • #12
Apashanka said:
View attachment 239314
Here T (tangent vector) is not pointing along the curve??

No, T is pointing perpendicular to the curve. Here's an illustration of what is meant by parallel transport.

We have a curve drawn in blue. The tangent vectors at two points, A and B, are drawn in black. The vector drawn in gray is the parallel-transport of the tangent vector at A to the point B. Since the parallel-transport of the tangent vector at A is not equal to the tangent vector at B, that means the curve is not a geodesic.

parallel.jpg
 

Attachments

  • parallel.jpg
    parallel.jpg
    8.8 KB · Views: 936
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis and Dale
  • #13
stevendaryl said:
No, T is pointing perpendicular to the curve. Here's an illustration of what is meant by parallel transport.

We have a curve drawn in blue. The tangent vectors at two points, A and B, are drawn in black. The vector drawn in gray is the parallel-transport of the tangent vector at A to the point B. Since the parallel-transport of the tangent vector at A is not equal to the tangent vector at B, that means the curve is not a geodesic.

View attachment 239320
Yes sir got it now...thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K