Parallel transportation of a vector along a closed triangle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on exercise 7.21 from "Hobson, Efstathiou, Lasenby, General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists," which involves demonstrating that the parallel transport of a vector along a closed triangle on a 2-sphere results in a vector orthogonal to the initial one. The participant, Manu, utilizes the Riemann tensor and closed path integrals to analyze the change in the vector. A key conclusion is that the equation for the change in the vector, \(\Delta v^{a} = -\frac{1}{2} R^{a}{}_{bcd} v^{b}_{P} \oint x^{c} d x^{d}\), is only valid for small loops, suggesting that a different approach is necessary for the larger triangle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann curvature tensor and its components
  • Familiarity with parallel transport in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of closed path integrals in the context of spherical geometry
  • Basic concepts of vector calculus in curved spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Riemann tensor in General Relativity
  • Learn about parallel transport on curved surfaces
  • Explore the implications of closed path integrals in spherical geometry
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of orthogonality in vector fields
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students studying General Relativity, particularly those interested in the geometric properties of curved spaces and vector transport. It is also relevant for anyone tackling advanced problems in differential geometry.

Manu_
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

I am trying to solve exercise 7.21 in the "Hobson, Efstathiou, Lasenby, General Relativity. An introduction for physicists."
What is asked is to show that the parallel transportation of a vector, along a closed triangle on a 2-sphere, results in an vector orthogonal to the initial one. The triangle has 3 right angles:

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRxE_a5WPYsrBZ4sZ_UiBWK-GIk0Ti2eQ3u7ksmu7Hh-5-kIzox2Lo8rQzi_g.jpg


Here is what I tried so far: I have started with
\Delta v^{a} = -\frac{1}{2} R^{a}{}_{bcd} v^{b}_{P} \oint \! x^{c} \, d x^{d}

where \Delta v^{a} = v^{a}-v^{a}_{P} is the change underwent by the vector (the initial one being evaluated at point P), and R^{a}{}_{bcd} is the Riemann tensor.

The metric being ds^{2} = a^{2} \left( d \theta^{2} +\sin^{2}{\theta} d\phi^{2} \right) the only independent component of the Riemann tensor is R^{\theta}{}_{\phi \theta \phi} = -R^{\theta}{}_{\phi \phi \theta} = -R^{\phi}{}_{ \theta \theta \phi} = R^{\phi}{}_{ \theta \phi \theta} = \sin^{2}{\theta}

I then find:
\begin{split}<br /> \Delta v^{\theta} &amp;= -\frac{1}{2} R^{\theta}{}_{\phi \theta \phi} v^{\phi}_{P} \oint \! \theta \, d \phi -\frac{1}{2} R^{\theta}{}_{\phi \phi \theta} v^{\phi}_{P} \oint \! \phi \, d \theta \\<br /> &amp;= -\frac{1}{2} R^{\theta}{}_{\phi \theta \phi} v^{\phi}_{P} \left( \oint \! \theta \, d \phi - \oint \! \phi \, d \theta \right) \\<br /> \end{split}

And the closed path integrals are (A is the pole, B is the left vertex and B the right one):

\oint \! \theta \, d \phi = \int_{A}^{B} \theta \, d\phi + \int_{B}^{C} \theta \, d\phi + \int_{C}^{A} \theta \, d\phi

I then say that \phi does not vary from B to C, since we stay on the equator, so:

\oint \! \theta \, d \phi = \int_{A}^{B} \theta \, d\phi + \int_{C}^{A} \theta \, d\phi = \theta \left( -\frac{\pi}{2} +\frac{\pi}{2} \right) =0

And the other closed integral gives:

\begin{split}<br /> \oint \phi \! \, d \theta &amp;= \int_{A}^{B} \phi \, d \theta + \int_{B}^{C} \phi \, d \theta + \int_{C}^{A} \phi \, d \theta \\<br /> &amp;= \int_{B}^{C} \phi \, d \theta \\<br /> &amp;= \phi \times \frac{\pi}{2}<br /> \end{split}<br />

In the end, I obtain:

\Delta v^{\theta} = \frac{\pi}{4} \phi v^{\phi}_{P} \sin^{2}{\theta}

And by similar calculations, I get:

\Delta v^{\phi} = \frac{\pi}{4} \phi v^{\theta}_{P} \sin^{2}{\theta}

And from this, I was tempted to use the scalar product between the new vector (denoted with a prime) and the old one to see if they cancel:

\begin{split} v&#039;^{a}v_{a} &amp;= v&#039;^{\theta}v_{\theta} + v&#039;^{\phi}v_{\phi} \\<br /> &amp;= \left( v^{\theta}+\frac{\pi}{4} \phi v^{\phi}\sin^{2}{\theta} \right) v_{\theta} + \left( v^{\phi}+\frac{\pi}{4} \phi v^{\theta} \sin^{2}{\theta} \right) v_{\phi} \\<br /> &amp;= v^{\theta}v_{\theta} + v^{\phi}v_{\phi} + +\frac{\pi}{4} \phi \sin^{2}{\theta} \left(v^{\phi}v_{\theta} + v^{\theta}v_{\phi} \right)<br /> \end{split}<br />

which don't seem to cancel at all. Could anyone possibly point out my mistake(s)?

Thank you!
Manu
 
Manu_ said:
Here is what I tried so far: I have started with
\Delta v^{a} = -\frac{1}{2} R^{a}{}_{bcd} v^{b}_{P} \oint \! x^{c} \, d x^{d}
This equation is only valid for a very small loop. I don't see any way to apply it directly to the large triangle that you are working with. I would suggest using parallel transport around the triangle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K