Paramagnetic term of the hamiltonian

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dd331
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian Term
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the simplification of the paramagnetic term in the Hamiltonian for a particle in an electromagnetic (EM) field, specifically the expression H para = -q/2m * (p.A + A.p). The participant seeks clarification on how this expression reduces to iqh/m * A.\nabla under the assumption that \nabla .A = 0, which corresponds to the Coulomb gauge. The factor of 1/2 is eliminated due to the application of the product rule in quantum mechanics, where the Hamiltonian acts on a wave function ψ, leading to the term (A.del) appearing twice.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically Hamiltonians.
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory and vector potentials.
  • Knowledge of the Coulomb gauge and its implications.
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, particularly the product rule and divergence.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of the Coulomb gauge in electromagnetic theory.
  • Explore the product rule in calculus and its applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the role of wave functions in quantum mechanics and their interaction with operators.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, particularly first-year undergraduates, physicists interested in electromagnetic interactions, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Hamiltonians in quantum systems.

dd331
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The Hamiltonian for particle in an EM field is

H = 1/2m (p - qA)^2 + q phi

If we take the cross-terms, which corresponds to the paramagnetic term, we have
<br /> H para = -q/2m * (p.A + A.p )<br /> = iqh/2m * (\nabla .A + A.\nabla)<br />

What I do not understand is how this simplifies into iqh/m * A.\nabla?

assuming that \nabla .A = 0 (i.e. Coulomb gauge). Why does the factor of 1/2 disappears? I'm only a first year undergraduate and I'm learning this on my own. I will appreciate it if you give a fuller answer. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In QM, H is assumed to act on a wave function \psi.
This means that del.A really means del.(A \psi)=(del.A)\psi + (A.del)\psi, so the (A.del) comes in twice.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K