Gauge Freedom Quantum Electrodynamics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the concept of gauge freedom in quantum electrodynamics, particularly in the context of Hamiltonians for systems with two or more particles in an electromagnetic field. Participants explore whether it is permissible to use different gauges for different particles while maintaining the condition that the curl of the vector potential equals the magnetic field.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a Hamiltonian for two particles in an electromagnetic field and questions if different gauges can be used for each particle while satisfying the gauge condition.
  • Another participant argues against the use of different vector potentials for the two particles, stating that a gauge transformation applies uniformly across all space points.
  • Some participants explain gauge invariance and its implications, noting that the equations of motion are gauge independent and depend only on the field components.
  • One participant provides examples of different gauges and claims that the resulting equations of motion remain unchanged.
  • Several participants challenge the initial Hamiltonian formulation and the idea of using multiple gauges, emphasizing the standard approach of using a single gauge for the entire system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on whether it is acceptable to use different gauges for each particle in the system. Some participants argue that only one gauge should be used, while others suggest that using different gauges does not affect the equations of motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the implications of using multiple gauges and the correctness of the Hamiltonian formulation for multiple particles. The discussion highlights the complexity of gauge choices in quantum electrodynamics without resolving the underlying mathematical or conceptual issues.

Juan Carlos
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
It's well known when if we are working on problems related to particles in presence of an electromanetic field, the way we state the problem can be done using the next Hamiltonian:
H=\dfrac{(p-\frac{e}{c}A)^2}{2m} +e \phi where the only condition for A is: \vec{\nabla } \times \vec{A} =\vec{B}
So we have this "gauge freedom" under (of course) the above condition .
What happens when are studying two or more partcles in presence of the electromagnetic field.

Naturally:
H=\dfrac{(p_{1}-\frac{e}{c}A)^2}{2m} +\dfrac{(p_{2}-\frac{e}{c}A)^2}{2m} +e \phi where the only condition for A is: \vec{\nabla } \times \vec{A} =\vec{B}

The question is: can we relax the condition of one unique gauge for all the particles?

Just saying:
can we select two different gauges? obviously with the condition : \vec{\nabla } \times \vec{A} =\vec{B}

I've been working on this, I satetd two different gauges and I can say that there is no difference in terms between the equations of motion having the same gauge. (Hamilton)

In particular I've done the same for the correspoding quantum problem obtainig the heisemberg equations, having the same result: no difference.

I'm interested on the quantum problem because having two different gauges could provoque loosing the symmetry of a Hamiltonian given.
 
Last edited:
Not sure what you mean by choosing two different gauges/vector potentials for the two particles. If you mean, whether you can use to different vector potentials at the two points which are the locations of the two particles, then the answer is negative. Once you apply a gauge transformation to fix gauge or change to a new gauge, you applying that transformation over all space points including the two locations of the two point charges.
 
Gauge invariance means that the scalar and vector potentials for the electromagnetic field (or better said the four-vector potential of the electromagnetic field) are only defined up to a four-gradient, i.e., if you have a four-vector potential ##A_{\mu}## then also
$$A_{\mu}'=A_{\mu} + \partial_{\mu} \chi$$
describes the same physical situation, i.e., you get the same field-strength tensor,
$$F_{\mu \nu}=\partial_{\mu} A_{\nu}' - \partial_{\nu} A_{\mu}'=\partial_{\mu} A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu} A_{\mu} + \partial_{\mu} \partial_{\nu} \chi - \partial_{\nu} \partial_{\mu} \chi = \partial_{\mu} A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu} A_{\mu}.$$
So you can impose one gauge condition. Depending on the situation you look at, the right choice of gauge can simplify the problem considerably. Usual gauge conditions are the Lorenz gauge
$$\partial_{\mu} A^{\mu}=0$$
and the Coulomb gauge
$$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}=0.$$

The equations of motion for your point-particle problem are gauge independent, because only the field components enter (in terms of the Lorentz force, ##q (\vec{E}+\vec{v} \times \vec{B})## (with ##c=1##).
 
Are you sure about your Hamiltonian for the two (or more) particles?
 
It's the standard construction.
ChrisVer said:
Are you sure about your Hamiltonian for the two (or more) particles?

It's the standard construction.
 
Roy_1981 said:
Not sure what you mean by choosing two different gauges/vector potentials for the two particles. If you mean, whether you can use to different vector potentials at the two points which are the locations of the two particles, then the answer is negative. Once you apply a gauge transformation to fix gauge or change to a new gauge, you applying that transformation over all space points including the two locations of the two point charges.

For Example: Let's suppose we have the magnetic field in the z direction, for example two Landau's gauges:
\vec{A_{1}}=B(-y,0,0) and \vec{A_{2}}=B(0,x,0) where both satisfy \vec{B}=B\vec{k}.

So in particular I could say that my Hamiltonian for the two particle system is:

H=\dfrac{(\vec{p_{1}}-\frac{e}{c}B(-y_{1},0,0))^2}{2m}+\dfrac{(\vec{p_{1}}-\frac{e}{c}B((0,x_2,0))^2}{2m} +e \phi

So I'm using two different gauges for my problem. I'm using it in that sense. What I'd like to emphasise is that the equations of motion are the same in comparison to those obtained when I use only one.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
vanhees71 said:
Gauge invariance means that the scalar and vector potentials for the electromagnetic field (or better said the four-vector potential of the electromagnetic field) are only defined up to a four-gradient, i.e., if you have a four-vector potential ##A_{\mu}## then also
$$A_{\mu}'=A_{\mu} + \partial_{\mu} \chi$$
describes the same physical situation, i.e., you get the same field-strength tensor,
$$F_{\mu \nu}=\partial_{\mu} A_{\nu}' - \partial_{\nu} A_{\mu}'=\partial_{\mu} A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu} A_{\mu} + \partial_{\mu} \partial_{\nu} \chi - \partial_{\nu} \partial_{\mu} \chi = \partial_{\mu} A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu} A_{\mu}.$$
So you can impose one gauge condition. Depending on the situation you look at, the right choice of gauge can simplify the problem considerably. Usual gauge conditions are the Lorenz gauge
$$\partial_{\mu} A^{\mu}=0$$
and the Coulomb gauge
$$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}=0.$$

The equations of motion for your point-particle problem are gauge independent, because only the field components enter (in terms of the Lorentz force, ##q (\vec{E}+\vec{v} \times \vec{B})## (with ##c=1##).

I get your point, is the usual treatment for one particle. But what I'm saying is related to the two particle system, where the question is: Is it correct use two different gauges, one for each particle?

Thank you
 
No, you should use one gauge for the whole calculation!
 
  • #10
vanhees71 said:
No, you should use one gauge for the whole calculation!
and the reason is? I repeat, equations of motion don't change.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
976
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K