Parameter sensitivity analysis for nonlinear system

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a nonlinear state space equation with parameters affecting system stability. The existence of a fixed point is determined by the condition involving the parameter μ, which influences the uniqueness of solutions. Stability analysis requires examining the eigenvalues of the linearized system around the equilibrium point, with changes in μ potentially affecting stability. The nonlinear nature of the system complicates stability conclusions, particularly far from the origin. Participants suggest that the equations may be analytically solvable and highlight the intriguing complexity of the problem.
Rahul Shenoy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am working on a problem, where I have arrived at the following nonlinear state space equation:

dx1/dt = x2;
dx2/dt = c11 x1 + c21x2 + c31x3 + c41x4 + c51x1x22;
dx3/dt = x4;
dx4/dt = c12 x1 + c22x2 + c32x3 + c42x4 + c52x1x22;

c11, c21, c31, c41, c51, c12, c22, c32, c42, c52 are all a function of a system parameter. I want to compute sensitivity of the system subject to parameter changes. The system has a stable equilibrium at (0,0,0,0) and I want to understand the affect of parameter changes on the stability. Can anyone suggest how I can approach this problem, as the system is nonlinear?
 
Rahul Shenoy said:
I am working on a problem, where I have arrived at the following nonlinear state space equation:

dx1/dt = x2;
dx2/dt = c11 x1 + c21x2 + c31x3 + c41x4 + c51x1x22;
dx3/dt = x4;
dx4/dt = c12 x1 + c22x2 + c32x3 + c42x4 + c52x1x22;

c11, c21, c31, c41, c51, c12, c22, c32, c42, c52 are all a function of a system parameter. I want to compute sensitivity of the system subject to parameter changes. The system has a stable equilibrium at (0,0,0,0) and I want to understand the affect of parameter changes on the stability. Can anyone suggest how I can approach this problem, as the system is nonlinear?

The condition for existence of a fixed point is that x_2 = x_4 = 0 and <br /> c_{11}x_1 + c_{31}x_3 = 0 \\<br /> c_{12}x_1 + c_{32}x_3 = 0. Define \mu = c_{11}c_{32} - c_{31}c_{12}. If \mu \neq 0 then the unique solution is (x_1, x_3) = (0,0), but if \mu = 0 then there are infinitely many solutions for (x_1, x_3) and thus a line of degenerate fixed points.

You will have to look at the eigenvalues of the linearization about the origin to determine the stability of the fixed point. I would expect stability to change as \mu passes through zero, but it may be that varying the system parameter won't make \mu pass through zero.

However we do find that \mu is the product of the eigenvalues, which are the roots of a quartic equation with real coefficients. Thus if \mu &lt; 0 then there exist an odd number of strictly negative real roots, which implies the existence of an odd number of strictly positive real roots, ie. the fixed point is unstable.
 
Last edited:
Yes, that is called 'local stability analysis'. You make the linear approximation and it is the same standard thing as usual lde's. That is the first thing you have to do. After that it gets interesting. :oldbiggrin:

For linear systems the conclusions about stability apply over the whole x1, 2, 3, 4 space.

But for nonlinear ones they may not when you are far enough away from your s.p. at origin. The behaviour there might be opposite.

Also your equations seem to allow more than one s.p. Whether you get that would depend on your parameter and the way the constants c depend on that.

I have a feeling that this equation might be analytically solvable. I think I have solved it for what happens at large x2.

For the case μ = 0 mentioned by pasmith x1 and x3 are in lockstep, in a constant ratio, so you can reduce the number of equations for that case.

Quite a fun problem.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K