Parameter sensitivity analysis for nonlinear system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the analysis of parameter sensitivity in a nonlinear state space system defined by the equations dx1/dt = x2, dx2/dt = c11 x1 + c21x2 + c31x3 + c41x4 + c51x1x22, dx3/dt = x4, and dx4/dt = c12 x1 + c22x2 + c32x3 + c42x4 + c52x1x22. The parameters c11, c21, c31, c41, c51, c12, c22, c32, c42, and c52 are functions of a system parameter, and the stability of the system is analyzed at the equilibrium point (0,0,0,0). The discussion highlights the importance of the determinant μ = c11c32 - c31c12 in determining the stability of fixed points, with implications for local stability analysis and the behavior of eigenvalues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nonlinear state space equations
  • Knowledge of eigenvalue analysis in stability theory
  • Familiarity with local stability analysis techniques
  • Concept of fixed points in dynamical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of linearization for nonlinear systems
  • Research the implications of eigenvalues on system stability
  • Explore the conditions for fixed points in nonlinear dynamics
  • Investigate analytical solutions for nonlinear differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, engineers, and students in control theory, dynamical systems, and applied mathematics who are analyzing nonlinear systems and their stability characteristics.

Rahul Shenoy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am working on a problem, where I have arrived at the following nonlinear state space equation:

dx1/dt = x2;
dx2/dt = c11 x1 + c21x2 + c31x3 + c41x4 + c51x1x22;
dx3/dt = x4;
dx4/dt = c12 x1 + c22x2 + c32x3 + c42x4 + c52x1x22;

c11, c21, c31, c41, c51, c12, c22, c32, c42, c52 are all a function of a system parameter. I want to compute sensitivity of the system subject to parameter changes. The system has a stable equilibrium at (0,0,0,0) and I want to understand the affect of parameter changes on the stability. Can anyone suggest how I can approach this problem, as the system is nonlinear?
 
Rahul Shenoy said:
I am working on a problem, where I have arrived at the following nonlinear state space equation:

dx1/dt = x2;
dx2/dt = c11 x1 + c21x2 + c31x3 + c41x4 + c51x1x22;
dx3/dt = x4;
dx4/dt = c12 x1 + c22x2 + c32x3 + c42x4 + c52x1x22;

c11, c21, c31, c41, c51, c12, c22, c32, c42, c52 are all a function of a system parameter. I want to compute sensitivity of the system subject to parameter changes. The system has a stable equilibrium at (0,0,0,0) and I want to understand the affect of parameter changes on the stability. Can anyone suggest how I can approach this problem, as the system is nonlinear?

The condition for existence of a fixed point is that x_2 = x_4 = 0 and <br /> c_{11}x_1 + c_{31}x_3 = 0 \\<br /> c_{12}x_1 + c_{32}x_3 = 0. Define \mu = c_{11}c_{32} - c_{31}c_{12}. If \mu \neq 0 then the unique solution is (x_1, x_3) = (0,0), but if \mu = 0 then there are infinitely many solutions for (x_1, x_3) and thus a line of degenerate fixed points.

You will have to look at the eigenvalues of the linearization about the origin to determine the stability of the fixed point. I would expect stability to change as \mu passes through zero, but it may be that varying the system parameter won't make \mu pass through zero.

However we do find that \mu is the product of the eigenvalues, which are the roots of a quartic equation with real coefficients. Thus if \mu &lt; 0 then there exist an odd number of strictly negative real roots, which implies the existence of an odd number of strictly positive real roots, ie. the fixed point is unstable.
 
Last edited:
Yes, that is called 'local stability analysis'. You make the linear approximation and it is the same standard thing as usual lde's. That is the first thing you have to do. After that it gets interesting. :oldbiggrin:

For linear systems the conclusions about stability apply over the whole x1, 2, 3, 4 space.

But for nonlinear ones they may not when you are far enough away from your s.p. at origin. The behaviour there might be opposite.

Also your equations seem to allow more than one s.p. Whether you get that would depend on your parameter and the way the constants c depend on that.

I have a feeling that this equation might be analytically solvable. I think I have solved it for what happens at large x2.

For the case μ = 0 mentioned by pasmith x1 and x3 are in lockstep, in a constant ratio, so you can reduce the number of equations for that case.

Quite a fun problem.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K