Parametric Equations for Line Integral: Finding the Correct Solution for C2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Puchinita5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parametric
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a line integral using parametric equations, specifically focusing on the vertical line segment of a triangle defined by vertices (0,0), (1,0), and (1,2). The original poster expresses confusion regarding the correct parametric equations for this segment, particularly in relation to the variable limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the parametric equations for the vertical line segment but questions the discrepancy between their result and that of the solutions manual. Participants discuss the importance of the parameter's range and how it affects the outcome.

Discussion Status

Participants have engaged in clarifying the parameterization process and the significance of the limits for the parameter. There is acknowledgment that different parameterizations can yield the same results if adjusted correctly. The conversation reflects a productive exploration of the topic without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of differing parameter ranges, with the original poster using a range from 0 to 1, while others refer to a range from 0 to 2. This difference is central to the discussion but remains unresolved.

Puchinita5
Messages
178
Reaction score
0
Evaluate the line integral by two methods: A) directly and B) using Green's Theorem.

\oint xydx +x^2y^3dy
where C is the triangle with vertices (0,0) , (1,0), and (1,2).

I don't need the whole problem done, but I need someone to show me the work for finding the parametric equations for part A because I am not getting the same answer as in the book.

Basically, the part I'm getting wrong is the parametric equations for C2, or the vertical line on the right side of the triangle.

I put that r=(1-t)<1,0>+(t)<1,2> = <1-t, 0> + <t, 2t> = <1, 2t>

so x=1, y=2t...

but my solutions manual says y=t. And I looked this problem up on Cramster and it said the same thing.

Why does y=t and not 2t? Where am I messing up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stewart Calculus? If so, what chapter/problem?
 
Chapter 17.4 problem 3 in the 6th edition.
 
A line can be parameterized many different ways. What do they have t running over? From 0 to 2? Are you having t run from 0 to 1?
 
Ah. They're running t between 0 and 2. It's the same as what you have (2t) between 0 and 1. Try doing it their way and see if you get the right answer. You should get the same answer your way if you make any necessary adjustments. Can't think of what adjustments they would be.. I think you just adjust the limits on your integral. I did this chapter ...five weeks ago now. My, how quickly I forget...
 
Hmmm. Now that you mention that, they have t going from 0 to 2 and so I would get the same answer since I was using 0 to 1. So I guess it doesn't matter?
 
Yup. The interval over which the parameter ranges is just as important as the equation defining the parameterization!

And yes, if you do it with your parameterization you'll get the correct answer.
 
What really matters is have you gotten the correct answer now?
 
Thanks! I was worried that since this is the first time i saw paremtrization in a few weeks that I had forgotten how to do them already. I was so confused!

I feel better now :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K