MHB Parametrizatrion of a Straight Line Segment in C - Simple Issue

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Straight line
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a confusion regarding the parametrization of a straight line segment in complex analysis, specifically in Example 1.22 from Mathews and Howell's book. The user struggles to derive the equation γ(t) = z(1 - t) from the given expression γ(t) = z1 + (z0 - z1)t. It is clarified that z(1 - t) refers to the function evaluated at 1 - t, not a multiplication. The user acknowledges the misunderstanding and thanks the helper for the clarification. The exchange highlights the importance of precise notation in mathematical expressions.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Mathews and Howell's book: Complex Analysis for Mathematics and Engineering. I am currently reading Section 1.6 - "The Topology of Complex Numbers". I have a problem with an aspect of Example 1.22 on page 38. My problem is a simple one related to algebraic manipulation of a couple of expressions ...

Example 1.22 reads as follows:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3747
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3748

In the above M&H write:

" ... ... Clearly one parametrization for -C is

$$-C : \gamma (t) \ = \ z_1 + (z_0 - z_1) t, \ \ \ \text{ for } 0 \le t \le 1$$.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that $$\gamma (t) \ = \ z ( 1 - t)$$, ... ... ... "

My problem is that I cannot show that $$\gamma (t) \ = \ z ( 1 - t)$$, which I suspect is a simple manipulation of symbols ...
Basically, we have

$$\gamma (t) \ = \ z_1 + (z_0 - z_1) t \ = \ z_1 + z_0 t - z_1 t $$ ... ... ... ... (1)But $$ z (1-t) \ = \ [ z_0 + (z_1 - z_0) t ] ( 1 - t ) $$

$$= z_0 + ( z_1 - z_0 ) t - z_0 t - ( z_1 - z_0 ) t^2$$ ... ... ... ... (2)Now I cannot see how further manipulation of the terms of (2) is going to give me the expression in (1) ... ... so how do we derive the equation $$\gamma (t) \ = \ z ( 1 - t)$$ ... ...

Hoping someone can help with this (apparently) simple issue ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Basically, we have

$$\gamma (t) \ = \ z_1 + (z_0 - z_1) t \ = \ z_1 + z_0 t - z_1 t $$ ... ... ... ... (1)But $$ z (1-t) \ = \ [ z_0 + (z_1 - z_0) t ] ( 1 - t ) $$

$$= z_0 + ( z_1 - z_0 ) t - z_0 t - ( z_1 - z_0 ) t^2$$ ... ... ... ... (2)Now I cannot see how further manipulation of the terms of (2) is going to give me the expression in (1) ... ... so how do we derive the equation $$\gamma (t) \ = \ z ( 1 - t)$$ ... ...

Hoping someone can help with this (apparently) simple issue ...

Peter
In this calculation, $z(1-t)$ does not mean $z$ multiplied by $1-t$. It means the function $z$ evaluated at $1-t$. So if $z(t) = z_0 + (z_1 - z_0) t$ then $z(1-t) = z_0 + (z_1 - z_0) (1-t)$.
 
Opalg said:
In this calculation, $z(1-t)$ does not mean $z$ multiplied by $1-t$. It means the function $z$ evaluated at $1-t$. So if $z(t) = z_0 + (z_1 - z_0) t$ then $z(1-t) = z_0 + (z_1 - z_0) (1-t)$.
Oh, yes of course!

... ... brain fade on my part ... ... quite silly of me ... ...

Thanks for the help Opalg,

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K