Parcel theory -- how can there be buoyancy with miscible gases?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of buoyancy in gases, specifically addressing how buoyancy can occur with miscible gases according to parcel theory. Participants explore the implications of temperature differences on gas density and the mechanical forces at play within a gas, considering both theoretical and experimental perspectives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Parcel theory suggests that heated air expands and rises due to decreased density, but the mechanism of buoyancy in gases is questioned by some participants.
  • Concerns are raised about how mechanical forces can be exerted between regions of the same gas that differ only in temperature, given that gas molecules are uncorrelated and can freely move between regions.
  • Some participants note that when the mean free path is very short compared to the size of the gas parcel, mixing occurs slowly, allowing parcels to rise or fall before they mix significantly.
  • It is highlighted that even at the same temperature, neighboring regions of gas at non-zero pressure exert equal but opposite forces on each other.
  • Participants acknowledge that while mixing occurs, it is much slower than the propagation of forces through molecular collisions.
  • A caveat is introduced regarding the implication of an N3 pair not necessarily indicating equilibrium.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the mechanics of buoyancy in miscible gases, with multiple competing views on the nature of forces and mixing in gases. No consensus is reached on the explanation of buoyancy in this context.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of buoyancy and the mean free path, as well as unresolved questions about the dynamics of gas mixing and force propagation.

raxp
Messages
11
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Parcel theory holds that the reason hot air rises is that its density is lower than the surrounding cold air, leading to Archimedean buoyancy. While this explanation is perfectly reasonable for a hot air balloon where there is a mechanical interface between the hot and cold gas, for warm and cold regions of an ideal gas, there can be no mechanical interface between the two.
Parcel theory holds that as air is heated, it expands. Its density hence decreases and the hot air "floats" upwards, pushed by the colder, more dense air surrounding it.

It is an experimental fact that hot air rises, but the explanation from buoyancy seems suspect. In a gas, all motions are uncorrelated, and the collision cross-section for each molecule is minuscule. How can there then be a mechanical force exerted between two regions of the same gas, differing only in their temperature? Each single molecule does not "know" to which parcel it belongs and may pass freely between them, unlike the case where there is some mechanical interface (the fabric of a hot air ballon, say) between the two regions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
raxp said:
How can there then be a mechanical force exerted between two regions of the same gas, differing only in their temperature?
When the "Mean Free Path" is very short, and the size of the parcel is large, the gasses do not mix rapidly. There is plenty of time for the parcel to rise or fall before it becomes mixed.

At sea level, the parcel dimension is 100 m or more, while the MFP is less than 100 nm. That is a difference of 9 orders of magnitude.
See the equations and table at the bottom of this section.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_free_path#Kinetic_theory_of_gases
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd, russ_watters, Orodruin and 1 other person
Baluncore said:
At sea level, the parcel dimension is 100 m or more, while the MFP is less than 100 nm. That is a difference of 9 orders of magnitude.
Ooh. I had no idea the mean free path for air at sea level was so short!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Baluncore
Drakkith said:
Ooh. I had no idea the mean free path for air at sea level was so short!
Not intuitive; I agree. But other numbers count too. There are zillions of molecules involved in diffusion between / within parcels of air. Most of our experiences of what a Science Teacher would call Diffusion (smells that drift around the room) do not involve stationary air.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
raxp said:
How can there then be a mechanical force exerted between two regions of the same gas, differing only in their temperature?
Two neighboring regions of the same gas at non-zero pressure always exert equal but opposite forces on each-other, even when at the same temperature.

raxp said:
Each single molecule does not "know" to which parcel it belongs and may pass freely between them,
Yes, but that mixing is much slower than the propagation of forces via repeated collisions.
 
A.T. said:
Two neighboring regions of the same gas at non-zero pressure always exert equal but opposite forces on each-other, even when at the same temperature.
Caveat here: But an N3 pair doesn't imply equilibrium
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K