Parity Operator, Symmetric Potential: Is V=PV?

[fantispug]

Let's say we have a symmetric potential, in position representation V(x)=V(-x) and let P be the parity operator.
Then quite clearly PV=VP but I was told the stronger statement V=PV is not true, but I thought

V=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} V\left|x\right\rangle\left\langle x \right| dx
(where I have used completeness and linearity of the integral... though I'm having second thoughts about linearity - can I just move the integral through V?)
V=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} V(x)\left|x\right\rangle\left\langle x \right| dx
V=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} V(-x)\left|x\right\rangle\left\langle x \right| dx
V=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} (PV(x))\left|x\right\rangle\left\langle x \right| dx
V=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} P(V(x)\left|x\right\rangle)\left\langle x \right| dx
V=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} P(V\left|x\right\rangle)\left\langle x \right| dx
V=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} (PV)\left|x\right\rangle\left\langle x \right| dx
V=(PV)

If V is not the same as PV, why not?
Cheers

 

[jostpuur]

If P acts like PV(x)=V(-x), then obviously PV=V for symmetric potentials, and your calculation was unnecessarily complicated. But I don't know how precisely your P is defined. Could it be, that it was defined so that it works like this PV(x)P^-1 = V(-x)?

hmh.. in fact this comes down to the question about what you want V to be. If you think that it is operator, that maps Psi into V*Psi, then PV=VP seems to be the only way.

In position representation V is an operator that maps the Psi like this

<br /> \Psi(x) \mapsto V(x)\Psi(x)<br />

Now you want to know what PV is. P maps the state V*Psi like this

<br /> V(x)\Psi(x)\mapsto V(-x)\Psi(-x)<br />

so, in other words

<br /> PV\Psi(x) = V(-x)\Psi(-x) = V(-x)P P^{-1}\Psi(-x) = V(-x)P\Psi(x)<br />

<br /> \implies PV(x)=V(-x)P \quad\Leftrightarrow\quad PV(x)P^{-1}=V(-x)<br />

Here the notation is bad, because it would be better to not have the (x) after the V, but its easier to write the operator V(-x) with this notation.

If you wanted to have PV=V, for symmetric potentials, this would imply

<br /> PV\Psi(x)=V(x)\Psi(x)<br />

which is wrong, because for symmetric potentials we have

<br /> PV\Psi(x)=V(x)\Psi(-x)<br />

 

[fantispug]

Yeah, I realize my calculation was overly complicated, but I felt like I was trying to justify the obvious and didn't know how to do it.
That actually makes a lot of sense - I was thinking completely wrong about how the operators work (dropping the vector it operates on). It makes sense to me now: if you trasform a state psi by \psi\rightarrow P\psi, the states must transform as A \rightarrow P^{-1}AP for consistency (which is the same as your expression for parity since the parity transformation is its own inverse)
Thanks for clearing it up.