I Partial derivative is terms of Kronecker delta and the Laplacian operator

Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
How to write partial derivatives in terms of Kronecker delta and the Laplacian operator?
How can the following term:

## T_{ij} = \partial_i \partial_j \phi ##

to be written in terms of Kronecker delta and the Laplacian operator ## \bigtriangleup = \nabla^2 ##?

I mean is there a relation like:

## T_{ij} = \partial_i \partial_j \phi = ?? \delta_{ij} \bigtriangleup \phi.##

But what are ?? term

Any help is appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It cannot.
 
Orodruin said:
It cannot.
So there is no any way to simplify ## \partial_i \partial_j \phi ## ?
 
Not really no. Not without knowing more. In some special cases, perhaps, but not as a general rule.

What is the context here?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top