Partial Derivative Notation in Chemistry Thermodynamics

  • Thread starter Thread starter danago
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
danago
Gold Member
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4
I am currently doing a class on chemical thermodynamics which involves a fair amount of calculus. So far it is going well, however i have a very quick question about the notation being used for partial derivatives.

If there is some property of a mixture, K=K(T,P), then the differential change in that propety is given by:

[tex] dK = \left(\frac{\partial K}{\partial T}\right)_P dT + \left(\frac{\partial K}{\partial P}\right)_T dP[/tex]

Where the subscripts T and P imply that they are being held constant. My question is -- Does the partial derivative not already imply everything except for one variable is held constant? Would [tex]\frac{\partial K}{\partial T}[/tex], by definition, be the change in K when ONLY T changes, without having to specift that P is held constant?

I guess what i am asking is -- is there is a difference between [tex]\frac{\partial K}{\partial T}[/tex] and [tex]\left(\frac{\partial K}{\partial T}\right)_P[/tex] that i was not made aware of in my first year calculus courses?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks Mark for clearing that up. I find it a bit strange that the book does it, because it really just makes equations look messier than they should.
 
As a justification, suppose [itex]u=y/x[/itex] and [itex]v=ux[/itex]. Is [itex]\partial v/\partial x=u[/itex] just because you only see that one occurrence of [itex]x[/itex] directly in the equation for [itex]v[/itex]? Of course not. That [itex]u[/itex] in the equation for [itex]v[/itex] is not truly an independent variable -- and neither are most of the variables involved in statistical physics.
 
D H said:
As a justification, suppose [itex]u=y/x[/itex] and [itex]v=ux[/itex]. Is [itex]\partial v/\partial x=u[/itex] just because you only see that one occurrence of [itex]x[/itex] directly in the equation for [itex]v[/itex]? Of course not. That [itex]u[/itex] in the equation for [itex]v[/itex] is not truly an independent variable -- and neither are most of the variables involved in statistical physics.

So are you saying that [tex]\partial v/\partial x \ne u[/tex], but [tex]\left(\partial v/\partial x\right)_u = u[/tex]? Have i understood you correctly?
 
Alright :smile:

Thanks for shedding some light on that