MHB Partial Fraction Simplification

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Partial
AI Thread Summary
To simplify the partial fraction expression, the multiplication of the binomials (Bx + C)(x + 3) needs to be performed. This results in Bx^2 + (3B + C)x + 3C. When combined with the other term (x^2 + 9), the overall expression becomes (B + 1)x^2 + (3B + C)x + (9 + 3C). This matches the textbook's formulation, confirming the derivation process. Understanding this multiplication is crucial for mastering partial fraction decomposition.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
I have this partial fraction:

$$ 18 = (x^2 + 9) + (Bx + C)(x + 3)$$

which the textbook says is equal to:

$$(B + 1)x^2 + (C + 3B)x + (9 + 3C)$$

But I don't follow this step. How do I derive this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay, we begin with:

$$\left(x^2+9\right)+(Bx+C)(x+3)$$

What to you get when you carry out the indicated multiplication of the two binomial expressions?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top