MHB Partial fractions (5x^2+1)/[(3x+2)(x^2+3)]

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the partial fraction decomposition of the expression (5x^2+1)/[(3x+2)(x^2+3)]. Participants identify a typo in the setup of the equation, clarifying that the correct form should include (Bx+C)(3x+2) in the numerator. They suggest substituting x=-2/3 to find the value of A, leading to the calculation of coefficients through comparison. The final values determined for the constants are A=-1, B=2, and C=2. This process highlights the importance of accurate notation and methodical coefficient comparison in partial fraction decomposition.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
Trouble here in the below partial fraction (Bug)

$\frac{5x^2+1}{(3x+2)(x^2+3)}$

One factor in the denominator is a quadratic expression

Split this into two parts A&B

$\frac{5x^2+1}{(3x+2)(x^2+3)}=\frac{A}{(3x+2)}+\frac{Bx+c}{(x^2+3)}$

$\frac{5x^2+1}{(3x+2)(x^2+3)}=\frac{A(x^2+3)}{(3x+2)}+\frac{Bx+c (3x+2)}{(x^2+3)}$

${5x^2+1}={A(x^2+3)}+{Bx+c (3x+2)}{}$

and cannot take it from here
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi mathlearn,

I believe you have a typo in your last line, it should be:
${5x^2+1}={A(x^2+3)}+(Bx+C) (3x+2)$

One way to move forward is to substitute $x=-2/3$, effectively zeroing the last term (which allows you to solve for $A$). Once we have $A$, unfortunately, we'll have to expand out all the terms and compare the coefficients of both sides of the equation.
 
Let's use a better method;

(5x^2+1)/(3x+2)(x^2+3) = A/(3x+2) + (Bx+C)/(x^2+3)

To find A,multiplying both sides of the equality by (3x+2) ;

(5x^2+1)/(x^2+3) =A + (3x+2)(Bx+C)/(x^2+3) (1)

Now,setting x=-2/3 or 3x+2=0,makes the expression on the right containing (3x+2) vanish,so(5(-2/3)^2+1)/((-2/3)^2+3) =A + 0 .Then,

A=29/31To find C,set x=0 in (1),so we get rid of b.Then,

1/3=29/31 +2C/3

So,c can be easily calculated.

To find b,plugging any number but -2/3 & 0 into x,say 1,

6/5=29/31 + 5(B+C)/4

We have found C,then B can be easily calculated.
 
Actually there are a number of mistakes- though probably mostly typos.

mathlearn said:
Trouble here in the below partial fraction (Bug)

$\frac{5x^2+1}{(3x+2)(x^2+3)}$

One factor in the denominator is a quadratic expression

Split this into two parts A&B

$\frac{5x^2+1}{(3x+2)(x^2+3)}=\frac{A}{(3x+2)}+\frac{Bx+c}{(x^2+3)}$
Okay.

$\frac{5x^2+1}{(3x+2)(x^2+3)}=\frac{A(x^2+3)}{(3x+2)}+\frac{Bx+c (3x+2)}{(x^2+3)}$
No, the fractions on the right must both have "$(x^2+ 3)(3x+ 2)$" as denominator and the final fraction should have numerator (Bx+c)(3x+ 2) not "Bx+ c(3x+ 2)".

\frac{5x^2+1}{(3x+2)(x^2+3)}=\frac{A(x^2+3)}{(3x+2)}+\frac{Bx+c (3x+2)}{(x^2+3)}$

${5x^2+1}={A(x^2+3)}+{Bx+c (3x+2)}{}$
Again that should be (Bx+ c)(3x+ 2).

and cannot take it from here
$5x^2+ 1= Ax^2+ 3A+ 3Bx^2+ 3cx+ 2Bx+ 2c$
$5x^2+ 0x+ 1= (A+ 3B)x^2+ (3c+ 2B)x+ (3A+ 2c)$
Since this is t0 be true for all x, "corresponding coefficients must be equal:
5= A+ 3B, 0= 3c+ 2B, and 1= 3A+ 2c

Subtract 3 times the second equation from twice the first:
10- 0= 2A+ 6B- 6c- 6B= 2A- 6c
Subtract 3(1= 3A+ 2c), 3= 9A- 6c from that:
7= -7A so A= -1. Then -3+ 2c= 1 so 2c= 4 and c= 2.
5= -1+ 3B so 3B= 6, B= 2.

A= -1, B= 2, and c= 2.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top