Undergrad Why Can't x/(x+1)^2 Be Split Like x/((x+1)(x+2))?

Click For Summary
Partial fraction decomposition requires different approaches based on the nature of the polynomial in the denominator. For x/((x+1)(x+2)), the decomposition is straightforward as a/(x+1) + b/(x+2). However, for x/(x+1)^2, the correct decomposition includes a term for the square, resulting in a/(x+1) + b/(x+1)^2. The confusion arises from the assumption that x/(x+1)^2 could be treated like x/((x+1)(x+2), but this is incorrect because combining terms like a/(x+1) + b/(x+1) simplifies to a single term, losing the necessary distinct second term. Thus, the presence of a squared factor in the denominator necessitates a specific form to accurately represent the function.
FS98
Messages
105
Reaction score
4
im a bit confused about partial fractions

If we have something like x/((x+1)(x+2)) we could decompose it into a/(x+1) +b/(x+2)

If we had something like x/(x+1)^2 we could decompose it into a/(x+1) + b/(x+1)^2

We use a different procedure when there is a square in part of the polynomial in the denominator.

What I don’t understand is why in the second case it wouldn’t be split into a/(x+1) + b/(x+1).

x/(x+1)^2 can be written as x/(x+1)(x+1). Then couldn’t we just use the procedure used in the first case?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In the decomposition to partial fractions, we use the fact that factors are coprime. For coprime elements ##n,m## we can find other elements ##a,b## such that ##1=an+bm## by the Euclidean algorithm and the ##1## can be extended to what we need.

Say we want to solve ##\dfrac{z}{n\cdot m} = \dfrac{q}{n}+\dfrac{p}{m}## with coprime ##n,m## and we found ##a,b## such that ##1=an+bm##. Then we have ##z= qm+pn=z\cdot 1 = zan+zbm## and thus ##q=zb## and ##p=za## or ##\dfrac{z}{n\cdot m}=\dfrac{zb}{n}+\dfrac{za}{m}##. All this because of Bézout's identity, resp. the fact that ##n,m## are coprime.
 
  • Like
Likes FS98 and mfb
FS98 said:
What I don’t understand is why in the second case it wouldn’t be split into a/(x+1) + b/(x+1).
The simple answer is because it doesn't work. Notice that ##\frac a {x + 1} + \frac b {x + 1}## is really the same as ##\frac c {x + 1}##, so you won't get that second term with the squared factor in the denominator.
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge and FS98
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K