MHB Partially Decoupled System with 3 variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omzyma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System Variables
Omzyma
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I have the following initial value problem:
\[ x' = x + 2y + 3z \]
\[ y' = 4y + 5z \]
\[ z' = 6z \]

All I'm looking to do is find the general solution to this system, and as long as I'm doing this correctly I have these answers:

\[ y(t) = K_2e^{4t} + \tfrac{5K_1}{2}e^{6t} \]
\[ z(t)=K_1e^{6t} \]

But I'm having trouble getting x(t) to finish this up. Any help on what my next steps should be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Omzyma said:
Hello!

I have the following initial value problem:
\[ x' = x + 2y + 3z \]
\[ y' = 4y + 5z \]
\[ z' = 6z \]

All I'm looking to do is find the general solution to this system, and as long as I'm doing this correctly I have these answers:

\[ y(t) = K_2e^{4t} + \tfrac{5K_1}{2}e^{6t} \]
\[ z(t)=K_1e^{6t} \]

But I'm having trouble getting x(t) to finish this up. Any help on what my next steps should be?
I agree with your solutions to z(t) and y(t). What's the difficulty? You will have
[math]x' = x + 2 \left ( K_2 e^{4t} \right ) + 3 \left ( \dfrac{5}{2} K_1 e^{6t} \right )[/math]

You've shown you can solve the homogeneous equation. So pick your particular solution: [math]x_p = A \left ( e^{4t} \right )+ B \left ( e^{6t} \right )[/math]

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I agree with your solutions to z(t) and y(t). What's the difficulty? You will have
[math]x' = x + 2 \left ( K_2 e^{4t} \right ) + 3 \left ( \dfrac{5}{2} K_1 e^{6t} \right )[/math]

You've shown you can solve the homogeneous equation. So pick your particular solution: [math]x_p = A \left ( e^{4t} \right )+ B \left ( e^{6t} \right )[/math]

-Dan
Thanks for your reply!

Picking [math]x_p = A \left ( e^{4t} \right )+ B \left ( e^{6t} \right )[/math] as my particular solution I ended up with [math]3A \left ( e^{4t} \right )+ 5B \left ( e^{6t} \right ) = 2K_2 \left ( e^{4t} \right ) + 3K_1 \left ( e^{6t} \right )[/math]

At this point do I solve for both A and B simultaneously, making either A or B as function of the other? Or should I just make like terms equal to each other and solve for A and B individually?
 
Omzyma said:
Thanks for your reply!

Picking [math]x_p = A \left ( e^{4t} \right )+ B \left ( e^{6t} \right )[/math] as my particular solution I ended up with [math]3A \left ( e^{4t} \right )+ 5B \left ( e^{6t} \right ) = 2K_2 \left ( e^{4t} \right ) + 3K_1 \left ( e^{6t} \right )[/math]

At this point do I solve for both A and B simultaneously, making either A or B as function of the other? Or should I just make like terms equal to each other and solve for A and B individually?
If you have [math]3A \left ( e^{4t} \right )+ 5B \left ( e^{6t} \right ) = 2K_2 \left ( e^{4t} \right ) + 3K_1 \left ( e^{6t} \right )[/math] true for all t then [math]3A = 2 K_2[/math] and [math]5B = 3 K_1[/math].

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
If you have [math]3A \left ( e^{4t} \right )+ 5B \left ( e^{6t} \right ) = 2K_2 \left ( e^{4t} \right ) + 3K_1 \left ( e^{6t} \right )[/math] true for all t then [math]3A = 2 K_2[/math] and [math]5B = 3 K_1[/math].

-Dan
So that would mean [math] A=\tfrac{2}{3} [/math] and [math] B = \tfrac{3}{5}! [/math]

Thanks for your help. Just needed a little nudge I guess.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Back
Top