Particle production in an expanding universe?

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Particle production in an expanding universe?
I was reading this interesting article [1] which talks about particle production in an expanding universe.

Usually this process is proposed to have occurred in the early universe, when the expansion was in the inflationary phase and it was so powerful that matter was created in particle production mechanisms.

However, can particles be produced in an accelerating expanding universe like our current one? Can particles be produced by the universe's expansion with the current conditions of our own one?[1]: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6633/ac1b23
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In general particles are produced from pairs of high energy photons. Extremely rare these days.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Suekdccia said:
However, can particles be produced in an accelerating expanding universe like our current one? Can particles be produced by the universe's expansion with the current conditions of our own one?[1]: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6633/ac1b23

mathman said:
In general particles are produced from pairs of high energy photons. Extremely rare these days.
Actually, pair production by photons is not the type of particle creation about which the articles talks. The article is about "particle creation" by dynamic spacetimes, something like a cosmological version of Hawking radiation.

From the arXiv version: page 18 "After inflation has ended, and the universe has entered a radiation or a matter dominated epoch, gravitational particle creation would normally be expected to become very small, as the spacetime curvature has become relatively small, and the expansion time correspondingly large."; page 19 "Another context in which quantum particle creation could become important in the late universe would if the effective equation of state of the matter in the universe were of the form ##p=w\rho##, where ##w<-1##, sometime called phantom matter. The equation of state causes such rapid expansion that curvature singularity arises, the 'Big Rip'"

So far, observations are consistent with ##w=-1##, which gives very very small particle production for the current accelerating phase of the universe.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and vanhees71
George Jones said:
Actually, pair production by photons is not the type of particle creation about which the articles talks. The article is about "particle creation" by dynamic spacetimes, something like a cosmological version of Hawking radiation.

From the arXiv version: page 18 "After inflation has ended, and the universe has entered a radiation or a matter dominated epoch, gravitational particle creation would normally be expected to become very small, as the spacetime curvature has become relatively small, and the expansion time correspondingly large."; page 19 "Another context in which quantum particle creation could become important in the late universe would if the effective equation of state of the matter in the universe were of the form ##p=w\rho##, where ##w<-1##, sometime called phantom matter. The equation of state causes such rapid expansion that curvature singularity arises, the 'Big Rip'"

So far, observations are consistent with ##w=-1##, which gives very very small particle production for the current accelerating phase of the universe.
Even if at small rates, is this "cosmological particle creation" supported by mainstream and verified physics?
 
Suekdccia said:
Even if at small rates, is this "cosmological particle creation" supported by mainstream and verified physics?
Do you consider Hawking radiation to be mainstream and verified?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
I'd say Hawking radiation is "mainstream" but not observed yet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K