Particles, Antiparticles, and Superpartners

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhilosophyofPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antiparticles Particles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of particles, antiparticles, and their proposed superpartners within the framework of particle physics and supersymmetry. Participants explore naming conventions for these particles and engage in light-hearted banter about the implications of these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that electrons have an antiparticle called a positron and speculate that electrons may have a superpartner called a selectron.
  • There is a humorous suggestion of names for the superpartner of the positron, such as "superpositron" or "spositron."
  • Participants discuss the naming convention for superpartners, indicating that fermion superpartners typically have names ending in "s" (e.g., electron -> selectron) while bosons have names ending in "ino" (e.g., photon -> photino).
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the name for the superpartner of the positron, questioning whether it should be "spositron" or "anti-selectron."
  • There is a mention that the anti-proton does not have a special name, leading to a playful suggestion of "santi-proton" or "anti-sproton."
  • Another participant agrees with the idea of "spositron" as a suitable name for the positron's superpartner.
  • Some participants reflect on the arbitrary nature of naming conventions in particle physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and uncertainty regarding the naming conventions for superpartners and antiparticles. There is no consensus on the correct terminology, particularly for the superpartner of the positron.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that naming conventions may not be strictly applied and that the choice of names can be arbitrary. There is also a recognition that the discussion involves speculative elements regarding supersymmetry and particle naming.

PhilosophyofPhysics
Messages
94
Reaction score
1
so electrons would have an antiparticle called a positron?

and it's possible that the electron also has a superpartner called a selectron?

if so would the positron also have a superpartner?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Superpostitron? Supositron?

Also what about exotic matter's? On top of that, what about exotic-anti-matter's superpartner? What are these particles are called?

well PhilosophyofPhysics, welcome to physicsforums and I would think they haven't gotten far enough for exotic-anti-matter's superpartners. Probably anti-matter.

I'm eager to find out.
 
To get the name of the superpartner, you just need to know wether it is a fermion or a boson. A fermion-superpartner has a name with an extra-s :
electron -> selectron
positron -> spositron
For boson, you add ino :
gluon -> gluino
photon -> photino

See, the rule are not exactly applied, so I am not sure about the spositron. Who needs supersymmetry anyway ? :-p
By the way :
human -> humanino :wink:
Well, I just had no idea how to find something original...

Welcome in PF PhilosophyofPhysics ! How did you came to pick your name ?
 
humanino said:
To get the name of the superpartner, you just need to know wether it is a fermion or a boson. A fermion-superpartner has a name with an extra-s :
electron -> selectron
positron -> spositron
For boson, you add ino :
gluon -> gluino
photon -> photino

See, the rule are not exactly applied, so I am not sure about the spositron. Who needs supersymmetry anyway ? :-p
By the way :
human -> humanino :wink:
Well, I just had no idea how to find something original...

Welcome in PF PhilosophyofPhysics ! How did you came to pick your name ?

humanino, nice way of choosing your name.
Why did you assume human is "boson-like", why not shuman ?

regards
marlon (easy, it refers to the great marlon brando, my alltime favourite...)
 
Yeah, Marlon was really a great actor !

For two reason, I chose boson : first, shuman seemed to me a bit too ... indian :wink:
Then, for statistics ! I want to hang around with as many other superpartner as possible (I am supposed to be a superpartner here).

That's really silly.
 
humanino said:
To get the name of the superpartner, you just need to know wether it is a fermion or a boson. A fermion-superpartner has a name with an extra-s :
electron -> selectron
positron -> spositron
For boson, you add ino :
gluon -> gluino
photon -> photino

Woo! That's really cool.

Since positron is anti-electron, what about anti-proton? That one doesn't have a special name. Santi-protron or Anti-sproton? :biggrin:
 
Mk said:
Woo! That's really cool.

Since positron is anti-electron, what about anti-proton? That one doesn't have a special name. Santi-protron or Anti-sproton? :biggrin:

:biggrin:

Actually, I thought that the anti-particle associated to the selectron would simply be called "anti-selectron'. But I might wrong on this (and after all, this is all simply an arbitrary choice of names...).

But if we go back to "ordinary" particles (not susy partners), the positron is an exception in the sense that it is the only antiparticle which has a 'special" name (the fact that it was the first antiparticle discovered explains this). All the other antiparticles are called "anti-name of particle" lik eantineutrinos, antimuons, etc. So I would expect the "anti-superpartners" to follow this route too, although I am not too sure about the positron case ("spositron" or "anti-selectron"?). :smile:

Pat
 
I totally agree with nrqed last post, and would propose spositron.
 
humanino said:
Who needs supersymmetry anyway ? :-p

Them QCD-quarkconfinement-guys need supersymmetry, caro humanino

und ich spreche auch Deutsch, ja, ja , jahwohl

Lebt wohl ,lebt wohl, auf Wiedersehen mein schönes Taubchen. :devil:

Ok the last thing, i really shouldn't be saying that to a guy... sorry...

regards
Der Marlon von Berlin
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K