MHB Particles on a Wedge Q4: Find Accel & Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter markosheehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Wedge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a wedge and two connected masses. The wedge, with a mass of 11 kg, is stationary while a 5 kg mass on a 30° incline and a 7 kg mass on a 45° incline are connected by a string over a pulley. Participants seek clarification on the use of acceleration in the problem, questioning whether it pertains to the particles or the wedge. It is clarified that the acceleration 'a' refers to the masses, not the wedge, since the wedge does not move. Understanding the forces and accelerations involved is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Q4 A wedge of mass 11 kg is held on the ground
with its base horizontal and smooth faces
inclined at 30° and 45° respectively to the
horizontal.
A 5 kg mass on the face inclined at 30° is
connected to a 7 kg mass on the other face by
a light inextensible string which passes over a
smooth light pulley.
The system is released from rest and the wedge does not move.
Find (i) the acceleration of the particles
(ii) the vertical force exerted on the ground.

i have the marking scheme to this question. here is the link http://thephysicsteacher.ie/Exam%20M...hemes/2015.pdf. it is question 6 part b. i don't understand how they work it out could someone explain it to me. first of all they use a for acceleration. what acceleration does this stand for the particle or the wedge. and if it stands for the particle why did they not resolve the acceleration parallel and perpindicular to the plane. why did they only use one acceleration . i learned to do these questions by always looking at both the acceleration of the particle and the wedge
markosheehan is online now Report Post
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
Q4 A wedge of mass 11 kg is held on the ground
with its base horizontal and smooth faces
inclined at 30° and 45° respectively to the
horizontal.
A 5 kg mass on the face inclined at 30° is
connected to a 7 kg mass on the other face by
a light inextensible string which passes over a
smooth light pulley.
The system is released from rest and the wedge does not move.
Find (i) the acceleration of the particles
(ii) the vertical force exerted on the ground.

i have the marking scheme to this question. here is the link http://thephysicsteacher.ie/Exam%20M...hemes/2015.pdf. it is question 6 part b. i don't understand how they work it out could someone explain it to me. first of all they use a for acceleration. what acceleration does this stand for the particle or the wedge. and if it stands for the particle why did they not resolve the acceleration parallel and perpindicular to the plane. why did they only use one acceleration . i learned to do these questions by always looking at both the acceleration of the particle and the wedge

Hi markosheehan!

I'm afraid your link does not work, so I can't comment on the marking scheme.

I can already say that since it says "the wedge does not move", $a$ won't refer to the wedge.
Instead $a$ would be the magnitude of the acceleration of one of the masses (or particles), which is the same as the acceleration on the other mass, since they're connected by an inextensible string.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top