Particle's spin when subject to a constant magnetic field

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Jalo
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An alkali atom, on it's fundamental state, passes through a Stern-Gerlach apparatum, which will only transmit atoms with their spins aligned along the +z direction. After that the atoms travel, during a finite time τ, through a region of constant magnetic field [itex]\vec{B}=B\vec{e_{x}}[/itex].

After that time τ the atoms pass through a new Stern-Gerlach apparatum, which only allows atoms with spin along -z to pass. What's the probability that they will pass?

Homework Equations



Pauli matrices
[itex]\widehat{H}=-\vec{u_{B}}.\widehat{S}[/itex]
[itex]u_{B}=\frac{q}{2m_{e}}[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution



From the problem it's easy to see that the state of the system at the instant t=0 is:

[itex]|\psi>(t=0)=|+>_{z}[/itex]

Then I assumed that, while being under the influence of the constant magnetic field along the x direction, the state is:

[itex]|\psi>=\alpha (t)|+>_{z} + \beta (t) |->_{z}[/itex]

Next I applied the hamiltonian to my state [itex]|\psi>[/itex]. Since [itex]\vec{B} = B\vec{e_{x}}[/itex]:

[itex]\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB}{2m}\widehat{S_{x}}|\psi>[/itex]
[itex]\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB}{2m}\widehat{S_{x}}(\alpha (t)|+>_{z}+\beta (t) |->_{z})[/itex]

Since [itex]\widehat{S_{x}}=\hbar \sigma _{x}[/itex], applying it to [itex]|\psi>[/itex] returns:
[itex]\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB\hbar}{4m}(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z})[/itex]

Defining [itex]\omega=\frac{qB}{4m}[/itex]:

[itex]\widehat{H}|\psi>=-w\hbar(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z})[/itex]

Now, using Schrödinger's equation we get:

[itex]\widehat{H}|\psi>=i\hbar \frac{d}{dt}|\psi>[/itex]
[itex]\frac{d}{dt}(\alpha (t)|+>_{z} + \beta (t) |->_{z}) = iw(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z})[/itex]

Separating this we get:

[itex]\frac{d}{dt}\alpha (t) = iw\beta (t)[/itex]
[itex]\frac{d}{dt}\beta (t) = iw\alpha (t)[/itex]

Applying another derivative to the first differential equation we get:
[itex]\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\alpha (t) = iw\frac{d}{dt}\beta (t)[/itex]
[itex]\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\alpha (t) = -w^{2}\alpha[/itex]

Doing the same to the second achieves a similar result:

[itex]\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\beta (t) = -w^{2}\beta[/itex]

Solving both I got:

[itex]\alpha (t) = Ae^{iwt} + Be^{-iwt}[/itex]
[itex]\alpha (t) = Ce^{iwt} + De^{-iwt}[/itex]

Now, since I know that [itex]|\psi>(t=0) = |+>_{z}[/itex], I know that:
[itex]A+B=1[/itex]
[itex]C = -D[/itex]

From this I can conclude that:
[itex]\beta (t) = Fsin(wt)[/itex]

This is as far as I can get.. I don't know what to do from here. Am I approaching the problem wrongly? Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.
Daniel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, Daniel.

First, there appears to be a problem with a factor of 2 in your expression
[itex]\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB\hbar}{4m}(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z})[/itex].

I don't believe the 4 in the denominator is correct. Did you include the "g-factor" of the electron? Anyway, you might see if you can track down the error. (Hope I'm not the one in error, I always get a headache with the factors of 2 in this type of problem!)

Later, you have

[itex]\alpha (t) = Ae^{iwt} + Be^{-iwt}[/itex]
[itex]\alpha (t) = Ce^{iwt} + De^{-iwt}[/itex]


In the second equation I think you meant to type [itex]\beta (t)[/itex] instead of [itex]\alpha (t)[/itex].

This looks good (but your ##\omega## will need to be corrected for the factor of 2 problem mentioned above).

But note, C and D are not independent of A and B. Remember you have

[itex]\frac{d}{dt}\alpha (t) = iw\beta (t)[/itex]

So, you can determine [itex]\beta (t)[/itex] from [itex]\alpha (t)[/itex].

You should be able to find A and B from the initial conditions and from the fact that you want your state to be normalized.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I forgot that I was only interested in the [itex]|->_{z}[/itex] component.
Regarding the factor of 2, I'll correct it. However my major issue has been resolved, so thanks!