A Pauli spin matrices

Eliena
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I tried to solve this expression (Οƒi β‹…Οƒj)Οƒk in terms of zth component of pauli spin matrices. So that i can apply the spin projection operator to the baryonic wavefunctions. As the Οƒy component contains the imaginary terms, so i think it is more convenient to write spin in terms of Οƒz only. Please give suggestions.
Using the identity for the dot product of Pauli matrices: πœŽπ‘–β‹…πœŽπ‘—=πœŽπ‘–π‘₯πœŽπ‘—π‘₯ + πœŽπ‘–π‘¦πœŽπ‘—π‘¦ + πœŽπ‘–π‘§πœŽπ‘—π‘§. How to express this purely in terms of πœŽπ‘§, as x and 𝑦 components change spin states
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can write it using ladder operators ##\sigma_{\pm}=\sigma_x\pm i\sigma_y##.
 
pines-demon said:
You can write it using ladder operators ##\sigma_{\pm}=\sigma_x\pm i\sigma_y##.
How it could be applied to the proton spin wavefunction?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top