PDE and differentiating through the sum

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
member 428835
Hi PF!

I'm reading my math text and am looking at the heat eq ##u_t = u_{xx}##, where we are are given non-homogenous boundary conditions. We are solving using the method of eigenfunction expansion.

Evidently we begin by finding the eigenfunction ##\phi (x)## related to the homogenous boundary conditions. From here we say the solution takes the form ##u(x,t) = \sum a(t) \phi(x)##. When plugging this result into the heat equation we are not allowed to differentiate w.r.t. x under the sum. The reason evidently is because the boundary conditions for the actual problem and ##\phi(x)## do not agree (the problem has non-homogenous B.C. yet the eigenfunction satisfies homogenous B.C.).

Can anyone tell me why not satisfying the same B.C. conditions implies we cannot differentiate w.r.t. that variable ##x##?

Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point is that you can approximate the solution arbitrarily well (in a distribution sense) with a function that does not fulfill the BC, i.e., the sum will converge to the solution everywhere but at the boundary.

A different way of taking care of your boundary conditions is to make a change of variables to transfer your inhomogeneity to the PDE rather than the BC. The resulting PDE can be solved using series expansion of the resulting inhomogeneity.