I'm working on a proof of the Peano Existence Theorem. It says that:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For a continuous ordinary differential equation dx/dt = f(x, t), wherexis inR^n and f is continuous on |t-t_0|<=a, ||x-x_0||<=b

when you have an initial value,x(t_0) =x_0, then there is a solution on |t-t_0|<= c, 0<c<=a.

Wikipedia has a pretty relevant statement of the theorem, though I'm trying it for dimensions higher than one. My confusion is more easily described by their statement at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_existence_theorem

They say that the function f is defined so that it satisfies the ODE on its interval of definition, then why can't you just use any continuous function y(x) as the z(x) in that explanation? It just seems like the second line of the statement of the theorem shows that such a solution exists.

If anyone has some insights to offer, I'd be much obliged.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Peano Existence Theorem confusion

Loading...

Similar Threads - Peano Existence Theorem | Date |
---|---|

I Uniqueness and Existence Theorm | Apr 29, 2017 |

I Interval of existence and uniqueness of a separable 1st ODE | Sep 28, 2016 |

Existence of general solution, 2nd order ODE | May 22, 2015 |

Understanding existence theorem of (strong) solution of SDE | Nov 13, 2014 |

Picard's and Peano's Theorem | Apr 12, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**