Pellet fired through one foam block, embeds in second block

  • Thread starter thehitchcocks
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Block
In summary: The 0.67 is the average speed. The average speed is the same for both the bullet and the block. The speed of the bullet was constant for the whole time it was in the block. The speed of the block was zero when the bullet entered and 1.1m/s when it left. So the average speed was 0.55m/s.The 0.55m/s gives the same answer even though it's the average speed not the speed at the moment the bullet leaves the block.The 0.67m/s is just the average of the two speeds given in the original problem.In summary, a 0.5 g pellet is fired horizontally at two foam squares resting on a frictionless tabletop.
  • #1
thehitchcocks
4
0

Homework Statement


A 0.5 g pellet is fired horizontally at two foam squares resting on a frictionless tabletop. The pellet rips through the first block (mass = 1 kg) and embeds itself in the second block (mass = 0.5 kg). As the bullet interacts with the blocks, it causes them to move with speeds of speed = 0.43 m/s and speed = 1.1 m/s, respectively. What is the speed of the pellet as it emerges from the first block?

Homework Equations


P=mv; conservation of momentum

The Attempt at a Solution


We began by calculating the momentum of the system in its final state, by adding the mass of the second block to the mass of the pellet, then multiplying by the final velocity of the second block (with the pellet embedded):

P3 = (0.0005kg + 0.5kg)(1.1m/s) = 0.55055 kg m/s

We then reasoned that, by conservation of momentum, the momentum of the pellet just prior to entering the second block would be equal to the momentum of the block+pellet after the pellet had embedded in the second block:

0.55055kg m/s = (0.0005kg) v

, where v is the entry velocity of the pellet into the second block. Solving for v:

v = (0.55055kg m/s) / 0.0005kg = 1101.1 m/s

Assuming that the difference between the velocity of the pellet as it exits the first block, and its velocity as it enters the second block, is negligible, the final answer would therefore be 1101.1 m/s.

However, the solution from the instructor took a different approach, and got a different answer. She states: "based on conservation of momentum, the second block and pellet should be equal to the combination of the first block and the pellet leaving the block."

Based on this reasoning, the solution given by the instructor is:

0.55055kg m/s = 0.0005v + 0.43
v = 241 m/s

What was wrong with our reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There is something dubious about your instructor's reasoning, unless there are missing details that you have not supplied in your description of the problem. Your instructor's solution is only correct if the first block had at some point collided with the second block and come to rest in the end. If the two blocks do not interact with each other at all throughout, then certainly your reasoning is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes billy_joule and thehitchcocks
  • #3
The first block will start moving/accelerating the moment the pellet hits it. However if the two blocks are in contact then the second one will also start moving while the pellet is still going through the first.

At the instant the pellet emerges from the first block the first block stops accelerating so it will have reached it's final velocity of 0.43 m/s. That means at this point both blocks must be going at 0.43m/s.

The pellet then enters the second block and accelerates that one from 0.43m/s to 1.1m/s.
 
  • Like
Likes thehitchcocks
  • #4
Fightfish said:
Your instructor's solution is only correct if the first block had at some point collided with the second block and come to rest in the end..
It's worse than that. The instructor is saying that as the bullet emerges from the first block, not only does the first block stop but it somehow transfers its momentum back to the bullet. So the bullet is now moving at its original speed.

As CWatters points out, it is not clear whether the blocks make contact before the bullet transits to the second block. Your calculation assumes it doesn't. If it does, the answer is between 600 and 700 m/s. Since that requires knowledge of the 0.43 m/s speed, and yours doesn't, I would suggest that is the intended interpretation of the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes thehitchcocks
  • #5
You guys are fantastic! Thanks for the quick and helpful replies ("like" given to all 3), which we discussed together yesterday, and used to work the problem again this morning.

To address the case where the blocks make contact, we solved for the following: "If a 0.5kg block is moving at 0.43 m/s, and a 0.0005kg pellet hits it such that the block is now moving at 1.1m/s, how fast was the pellet moving when it entered the block?"

Using P=mv and the conservation of momentum, m1v1 = m2v2 -> (0.5005)(0.67) = (0.0005)v2 -> v2 = 671 m/s.

We'll go back and talk with the instructor! Thanks again for your great help. Since we're new: if there's another way we can thank or up-vote your help, beyond the "likes" we gave to each reply, please let us know!
 
  • #6
thehitchcocks said:
Using P=mv and the conservation of momentum, m1v1 = m2v2 -> (0.5005)(0.67) = (0.0005)v2 -> v2 = 671 m/s.
That's what I got.
 

1. How does a pellet fired through one foam block embed in a second block?

The pellet embeds in the second block due to the kinetic energy it possesses. When the pellet is fired through the first foam block, it transfers its energy to the second block upon impact, causing it to embed in the foam.

2. What factors affect the depth of the pellet's embedding?

The depth of the pellet's embedding can be affected by several factors, including the velocity of the pellet, the density of the foam blocks, and the angle at which the pellet is fired. These factors all influence the amount of kinetic energy transferred to the second block upon impact.

3. Can the embedding depth be predicted?

Yes, the embedding depth can be predicted by using mathematical equations that take into account the variables mentioned above. However, the accuracy of the prediction may vary depending on the specific materials and conditions involved in the experiment.

4. How is this phenomenon relevant in scientific research?

This phenomenon can be relevant in various scientific research fields, such as materials science, ballistics, and impact studies. It can provide insights into the behavior of different materials and the effects of high-velocity impacts.

5. Are there any real-world applications of this research?

Yes, there are several real-world applications of this research, including designing better protective gear for sports and military purposes, improving building materials to withstand high-velocity impacts, and developing more efficient bulletproof materials.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
980
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top