I've just watched the lecture of Penrose on his cyclic unverse theory here:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I fact I understood that he claims that any kind of matter dissapears in a couple of Googol years due to Hawking radition; so there is no matter left at the end, which leads to a reduced degree of freedom in terms of the 2nd law of thermodynamics which then "re-initializes" space (or so ... my term) and leads to another big bang.

What I do not understand is why he claims his aeons being sequential. In fact, time somehow is a product of mass movement in space and if there is no mass, there is no time.

So then, why can't these aeons exist parallel to ours?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Penrose's cyclic universe - question

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**