MHB Percentage in Commission Calculation Issue

  • Thread starter Thread starter mitsu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
mitsu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to figure out a formula for a pay plan, I think we are calculating things incorrectly but I can't seem to work out the right formula..

The idea is that an employee is paid a percentage of the business's net income, the owner believes that percentage should be after their pay is calculated, the theory being the managers pay is an expense, so the true net income of the business is net of his pay and that's the number pay should be calculated from...

they are proposing to do it like this...

net income - 100,000

pay plan - 25 percent

so they go 100,000 x 75 percent = 75,000

then pay the 25 percent from that number which is 18750.

Doesn't seem right to me since 75,000+18,750 = 93750

leaving an amount of 6,250 that the employee should be entitled to a portion of...

This seems wrong to me as the true net income is not 75,000, it is 81,750 with that formula...

Would the formula be the same no matter what percentage was being used ? (ie whether the employee pay plan was being calculated at 10 or 15 or 20 % )

Hoping someone can help me figure out (what I feel like) should be a simple formula...
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Looks to me that something like this is going on:

Income before commissions : A

Commissions : B

Net income: A-B

The weird part: B is calculated using a certain percentage
of (A-B), not on A alone.

If you want a reasonable answer, post your problem
reasonably clearly...guessing is not the way...
 
Here's an example of what I mean:
Code:
Gross income            96,800

Tax#1: 15% of Gross    -14,520 : 96800 * .15

Tax#2: 10% of Net      - 7,480 : 74800 * .10
                       =======
Net income              74,800
Calculation of Tax#2 a bit tricky, since Net income not known.
This'll work:

g = 96800

x = g * (1 - .15) = 96800 * .85 = 82280

n = x / (1 + .10) = 82280 / 1.10 = 74800

Tax#2 = x - n = 82280 - 74800 = 7480
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top