Peres-Horodecki criterion for a 3-qubit system

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MMS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Peres-Horodecki criterion is necessary and sufficient for determining entanglement in 2x2 and 2x3 density matrices but does not hold for 3-qubit systems represented by 8x8 matrices. Users should be cautious when applying this criterion to larger systems, as it may lead to incorrect conclusions about entanglement. The discussion references the original paper available at arxiv.org for further details.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and entanglement concepts
  • Familiarity with density matrices and their representations
  • Knowledge of the Peres-Horodecki criterion and its applications
  • Basic skills in linear algebra, particularly with matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the limitations of the Peres-Horodecki criterion for higher-dimensional systems
  • Study alternative methods for detecting entanglement in 3-qubit systems
  • Explore the implications of the original paper on the Peres-Horodecki criterion
  • Learn about other entanglement criteria applicable to multi-qubit systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum information theory, and anyone studying multi-qubit entanglement and its criteria.

MMS
Messages
146
Reaction score
4
Hello everyone,

Is the Peres-Horodecki criterion correct for any density matrix nxn?
I have a 3 qubit state (an 8x8 matrix) and I want to check whether it's entangled or not and I'm not sure if it's the right approach. Seems a little too cumbersome.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AFAIK the Peres criterion is sufficient for any density matrix, but it's if and only if only for 2 qubit density matrices, that is for your matrix it may fail and still you might have an entangled state
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
804
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
677
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K