MHB Perfect Numbers: Proving Even Exponents

AI Thread Summary
A perfect number is defined as one where the sum of its divisors equals twice the number itself. The discussion centers on proving that for perfect numbers greater than six, the exponent of the smallest prime factor in its prime factorization is even. A participant shares a partial solution but expresses uncertainty about extending it to all cases. Another participant acknowledges the initial idea and offers a hint for further progress. The conversation highlights the complexity of proving properties related to perfect numbers.
Fallen Angel
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Let $n >6$ be a perfect number (A number $n$ is called perfect if $s(n)=2n$ where $s(n)$ is the sum of the divisors of $n$) with prime factorization $n=p_{1}^{e_{1}}p_{2}^{e_{2}}\cdots p_{k}^{e_{k}}$ where $1<p_{1}<p_{2}<\ldots <p_{k}$. Prove that $e_{1}$ is even
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Great challenge! I have a partial solution below, but I am not sure how to extend it to the remaining cases. I might come back to it later.​

Proof for $n$ even:

All even perfect numbers are of the form $n = 2^{p - 1} (2^p - 1)$ whenever $2^p - 1$ is prime by the Euclid-Euler theorem. If $p > 2$, that is, $n > 6$, $p$ must be odd so $2^{p - 1}$ is an even power and the result immediately follows.

Proof for $n$ odd:

If $n$ is odd, then it can be written as $p_1^{e_1} r$ where $p_1$ is the smallest odd prime factor of $n$ and $r$ is an odd number not divisible by $p_1$. Assume $n$ is perfect, then it can be written as:
$$2n = s(r) + p_1 s(r) + \cdots + p_1^{e_1} s(r)$$
This is equivalent to:
$$2n = s(r) \left ( 1 + p_1 + \cdots + p_1^{e_1} \right )$$
Now suppose $r$ is not a square, so that $s(r)$ is even. It follows $n$ can be perfect only if the $1 + p_1 + \cdots + p_1^{e_1}$ term is odd, and it is odd if and only if $e_1$ is even. It remains to check the case for $r$ square, but I don't know how to do that; possibly this is not the right approach.​
 
Hi Bacterius, good work!

Your idea is good, if yo want a hint, open the next spoiler
From $2n=s(r)(1+p_{1}+p_{1}^{2}+\ldots +p_{1}^{e_{1}})$

Try to determine what happens if $(p+1)$ divides $(1+p_{1}+p_{1}^{2}+\ldots +p_{1}^{e_{1}})$ taking into account that $s(r)=\displaystyle\prod_{i=2}^{k}(1+p_{i}+p_{i}^{2}+\ldots +p_{i}^{e_{i}})$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top