Perfectly inelastic collision and inelastic collision

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between perfectly inelastic collisions and inelastic collisions, using a scenario involving two gliders on a frictionless air track. Glider 1 (0.5 kg, 2 m/s left) and Glider 2 (0.3 kg, 2 m/s right) collide, resulting in Glider 2 moving left at 2 m/s and Glider 1 having a final velocity of -0.4 m/s. This outcome indicates that the collision is not perfectly inelastic, as the two gliders do not stick together post-collision, contradicting the definition found on Wikipedia. The conclusion drawn is that the collision is inelastic, allowing for separate motion after impact.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum conservation principles
  • Familiarity with the concepts of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Basic knowledge of mass and velocity calculations
  • Ability to apply equations of motion in collision scenarios
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of momentum conservation in inelastic collisions
  • Learn about kinetic energy loss during inelastic collisions
  • Explore examples of perfectly inelastic collisions in physics
  • Review the mathematical derivation of collision equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and collision theory, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of inelastic and perfectly inelastic collisions.

Kurokari
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two gliders move toward each other on a frictionless linear air track.

Glider 1, mass = 0.5kg , velocity = 2m/s (to the left)
Glider 2, mass = 0.3kg , velocity = 2m/s (to the right)

After collision, glider 2 moves away (to the left) with final velocity of 2m/s.

___________________________________________________________________

The question I want to ask is that, I read up on wikipedia, saying perfectly inelastic collision will result in the two objects sticking together and moving with a same final velocity.

However in this question, I found out the final velocity for glider 1 to be v = -0.4m/s, which doesn't support what Wikipedia has since glider 2 moves to the left with 2 m/s. So I'm thinking maybe the question given is NOT a perfectly inelastic collision, can anyone clear my doubts about this?

Homework Equations



m1v1 + m2v2 = m1u1 + m2u2


The Attempt at a Solution



substituting masses and velocities into the above equations will get me v1 = -0.4 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
The question directly states, if I understand you correctly that,
After collision, glider 2 moves away (to the left) with final velocity of 2m/s.
Which implies that, once one of them has started to move separately, you can no longer consider it as a "perfectly" inelastic interaction between them. Rather, there could be a loss of kinetic energy due to other factors, but not such that would prompt them to coalesce.
I hope that helps,
Daniel
 
Collision is not perfectly inelastic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
928
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K