I Permeability of Metglas and Propagation Velocity

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter pete94857
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Higher permeability materials can slow the propagation of magnetic reactions, as they allow for more reactions to occur, which can lead to slower travel speeds compared to lower permeability materials. Two velocities are crucial: the wave propagation speed along the material's surface, which is nearly the speed of light, and the slower propagation into the material itself, which can be just a few meters per second. Laminating magnetic materials with insulated gaps can enhance the speed of magnetic field propagation along the laminations compared to a solid bar. Metglas, due to its properties, is best utilized in thinner forms like wires or tapes rather than thick bars, which are harder to manufacture. Overall, both sources of information regarding permeability and speed have validity in different contexts.
pete94857
Messages
99
Reaction score
9
TL;DR Summary
Metglas. Speed of which the material reacts to the change.
I have conflicting information hence here I am. 2 different source that I believe to be credible have given me 2 different answers. And both actually make sense.

Does a higher permeability mean that the reaction through the material will actually travel (not travel but just in a descriptive sense) along the material slower than a lower permeability material.

One source describes it as because there's more of a reaction occurring in a higher permeability material then the "travel" will be slower such as in metglas being typically 3 to 10 m/s depending on environment and type of magnetism applied.

The other source put a higher permeability to a higher speed.

Both seems to make sense.

Example I had a 3 metre long bat of metglas with a cross section of 10mm by 10mm and applied a neodymium magnet (20mm cube 10kg pull) to one end it would take 1 second (approx) to reach the other end. With about 80% efficiency therefore 8kg pull at the far end. In a vacuum chamber with good contact between the magnet and the bar.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two velocities that are important.

The first is the velocity of wave propagation along the boundary between the material and air or space. That will be close to the speed of light, slowed down by the dielectric constant of the surface coating.

The second is the velocity of propagation into the material, perpendicular to the surface, which is much slower. It is often compared to the speed you can run, measured as a few meters per second.

If you laminate the magnetic material, with insulated gaps of about 5% of the lamination thickness, you will find that the full strength of the magnetic field propagates much faster along the laminations than through a solid bar.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect#Material_effect_on_skin_depth
 
Baluncore said:
There are two velocities that are important.

The first is the velocity of wave propagation along the boundary between the material and air or space. That will be close to the speed of light, slowed down by the dielectric constant of the surface coating.

The second is the velocity of propagation into the material, perpendicular to the surface, which is much slower. It is often compared to the speed you can run, measured as a few meters per second.

If you laminate the magnetic material, with insulated gaps of about 5% of the lamination thickness, you will find that the full strength of the magnetic field propagates much faster along the laminations than through a solid bar.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect#Material_effect_on_skin_depth
Thank you.
 
Baluncore said:
There are two velocities that are important.

The first is the velocity of wave propagation along the boundary between the material and air or space. That will be close to the speed of light, slowed down by the dielectric constant of the surface coating.

The second is the velocity of propagation into the material, perpendicular to the surface, which is much slower. It is often compared to the speed you can run, measured as a few meters per second.

If you laminate the magnetic material, with insulated gaps of about 5% of the lamination thickness, you will find that the full strength of the magnetic field propagates much faster along the laminations than through a solid bar.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect#Material_effect_on_skin_depth
So kind of both are correct. An almost instant but small reaction felt at the far end of the bar but a larger change that moves (kind of) along the bar at a much slower pace the higher the permeability the slower it will be ?

Have I understood it correctly.

Would the example on the efficiency be correct for metglas ?
 
pete94857 said:
Have I understood it correctly.
Probably.

Propagation into the body of the material is slowed, both by higher conductivity, and by higher permeability. Metglas fits that description, and so is best applied by bundling chemically insulated wires, tapes, or laminations. A thick metglas bar would be difficult to manufacture, because it cannot be cooled as quickly as a thin tape or wire.
 
Baluncore said:
Probably.

Propagation into the body of the material is slowed, both by higher conductivity, and by higher permeability. Metglas fits that description, and so is best applied by bundling chemically insulated wires, tapes, or laminations. A thick metglas bar would be difficult to manufacture, because it cannot be cooled as quickly as a thin tape or wire.
OK thanks really appreciate it
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top