MHB Permutation question concerning cycle shapes

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that for any element f in the subset K_4 of S_4, the conjugate h^{-1}fh for any h in S_4 will also belong to K_4. The key point is that the cycle structure of any permutation in K_4, specifically those of the form (2,2), is preserved under conjugation. A specific example is provided using the permutation (12)(34), demonstrating that conjugating it results in another permutation with the same cycle structure. This reasoning applies to all elements of K_4, confirming that h^{-1}fh remains in K_4 for all f and h. The conclusion reinforces the consistency of cycle shapes under conjugation in this context.
Confusedalways
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Consider the subset of $S_4$ defined by

$$K_4=\{(1)(2)(3)(4),(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)\}$$

Show that for all $f \in K_4$ and all $h \in S_4$, we have $h^{-1}fh \in K_4$

I showed all the possible cycle shapes of h and am trying to show that $h^{-1}fh$ must always have cycle shape $(2,2)$, excluding the case of identity permutation.

Just don't know where to go from here
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Confusedalways! Welcome. (Wave)

You're on the right track. Consider the following fact. If $\sigma = (a_1 \cdots a_r)$ is a cycle in $S_n$ and $\tau\in S_n$, then $\tau \sigma \tau^{-1} = (\tau(a_1)\cdots \tau(a_r))$. Take for instance $(12)(34)$. For all $h\in S_4$, $$h(12)(34)h^{-1} = h(12)h^{-1}h(34)h^{-1} = (h(1)\;h(2))\,(h(3)\;h(4))$$

so $h(12)(34)h^{-1}$ has cycle structure $(2,2)$. The same argument applies to the others.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
456
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
772
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K