Showing any transposition and p-cycle generate S_p

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jackmell
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 6K views
jackmell
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
54
I was hoping someone could help me understand the following proof from:

http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/grouptheory/genset.pdf
Corollary 2.10. For a prime number ##p##, ##S_p## is generated by any transposition and any p-cycle. Proof. Any p-cycle can be written as (12...p) by relabeling the objects being permuted (that means by applying an overall conjugation on ##S_p##), so to show any transposition and any p-cycle generate ##S_p## it suffices to show any transposition and the standard p-cycle (12...p) generate ##S_p##

The problem I'm having is the line ``Any p-cycle can be written as ##(1\;2\;\cdots\;p)## by relabeling the objects being permuted by applying an overall conjugation on ##S_p##''.

An example helps me to understand:

Suppose I have ##R=(3\;5),Q=(4\;1\;2\;5\;3)\in S_5##. Now, I take this to mean if I conjugate the entire group, ##\sigma S_5 \sigma^{-1}## such that ##\sigma Q \sigma^{-1}=(1\;2\;3\;4\;5)##, then I've effectively ``relabeled'' ##Q## with ##(1\;2\;3\;4\;5)##. That's easy to accomplish since in general for ##\rho=(a\;b\;c\;d\;e)##, ##\sigma\rho\sigma^{-1}=(\sigma(a)\;\sigma(b)\;\sigma(c)\;\sigma(d)\;\sigma(e))##. Then let ##\sigma=(1\;2\;3\;5\;4)## and then we have ##(1\;2\;3\;5\;4)(4\;1\;2\;5\;3)(4\;5\;3\;2\;1)=(1\;2\;3\;4\;5)##. Therefore I assume this all means:

##
\big<(3\;5),(4\;1\;2\;5\;3)\big>=\big<(h\;k),(1\;2\;3\;4\;5)\big>
##

since conjugation is an automorphism (it's a bijection) and where ##(h\;k)## is the conjugation of ##(3\;5)## and just accepting for the moment if I can get it to that form, it generates the group via the second part of the theorem which I will accept for now.

Am I interpreting this correctly?

Thanks for reading,
Jack
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.

The second part of the theorem is proven as Theorem 2.8 of what you linked.

Given that, you just need to write out the formulas by which an arbitrary element g of the group can be expressed in terms of a transposition T and a p-cycle C by first using Theorem 2.8 to express the conjugate of g in terms of another transposition (why not choose (1 2) WLOG) and the standard p-cycle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jackmell