MHB Solving Permutations Question with Restrictions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lancelot1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Permutations
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of permutations for a 3-digit code using the digits 1 to 9, with the restriction that each digit must be equal to or larger than the previous one. The initial approach considers unrestricted permutations, leading to calculations of \(9^{3}\) for identical digits and \(9 \cdot 8 \cdot 7\) for distinct digits. The key insight is that the problem can be transformed into counting multisets, where the number of ordered tuples \((a,b,c)\) corresponds to the number of multisets of size 3. The final answer is determined to be \(\binom{11}{3}\), supported by a bijection between multisets and non-decreasing triples. This method effectively resolves the permutation question under the given restrictions.
Lancelot1
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hello all

Please look at this questions:

What is the number of permutations for creating a code of 3 digits from the digits 1,2,3,...,9 , such that every digit is equal or larger from the previous one ?

I know that if I wanted the number of permutations without restrictions it would be:

\[9^{3}\]

If all digits can be the same. Otherwise it would be

\[9\cdot 8\cdot 7\]

How do I approach the restriction, I mean, there are many possibilities, it depends on the numbers that I get.

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The number of ordered tuples $(a,b,c)$ where $1\le a\le b\le c\le 9$ is equal to the number of multisets $\{a,b,c\}$ because every multiset can be ordered in ascending order in a unique way.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
The number of ordered tuples $(a,b,c)$ where $1\le a\le b\le c\le 9$ is equal to the number of multisets $\{a,b,c\}$ because every multiset can be ordered in ascending order in a unique way.

Do you mean that the answer is :

\[\binom{11}{3}\] ?

I don't understand the rational behind it.
 
Lancelot said:
Do you mean that the answer is :

\[\binom{11}{3}\] ?
Yes. Because there is a bijection $f$ between the set of multisets of size 3 and the set of non-decreasing triples. Namely, $f(s)$ is $s$ sorted in increasing order.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Back
Top