Permutations with Restrictions: Solving a Combination Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combination
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the number of ways to arrange the first ten letters of the alphabet, specifically the letters a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, under certain restrictions. The restrictions require that a, b, and c must be adjacent, while d cannot be adjacent to either a or b.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to calculate the arrangements, including initial attempts to subtract cases where d is adjacent to a or b. Some suggest creating cases based on the adjacency of a, b, and c, while others question the validity of certain subtractions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches and refining their calculations. Some have provided guidance on how to correctly account for the arrangements, while others are still questioning the assumptions made in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem, including the specific adjacency requirements for the letters. There is a focus on ensuring that the arrangements adhere to the stated restrictions without overlooking any potential cases.

member 428835

Homework Statement


how many ways can ##a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j## (first ten letters of the alphabet) be interchanged if ##a,b,c## must be adjacent and if ##d## cannot be touching the ##a## nor can it touch the ##b##?

The Attempt at a Solution


to start, i figure we can take the total number of ways that ##a,b,c## without the ##d## restriction and then subtract the ways the ##d## mingles with the ##a,b##. thus, we have (i think)
$$3!8! - 3 \times 3!7!$$

thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
actually, i think i need to make some cases, thus would it be:
$$3!8! - (3\times 2!2! + 4 \times 2!)7!$$
where the first case is when we have the ##a,b## adjacent and the second case we have the ##c## always in the middle.

what do you think?
 
I think you're still subtracting too much. The 7! factor is fine, of course.
Remember you should only be subtracting cases where a, b and c are an adjacent trio. That doesn't leave many illegal places for the d.
 
hmmmm how about $$3!8! - (2 \times 2!2! + 4 \times 2!)7!$$ if the ##a,b## are adjacent we have ##2!## spots for them and then ##2!## spots for them and the ##c##. this then leaves us with ##2## spots for the ##d## to still touch the ##a,b##.

we also have the situation where the ##a,b## are not adjacent, and the ##c## is in the middle. thus, there are ##2!## ways to arrange the ##a,b## around the ##c##. however, there are now ##4## spots we can place the ##d##.

without the ##7!## this leaves only 16 arrangements. that sounds good or too much?
 
joshmccraney said:
hmmmm how about $$3!8! - (2 \times 2!2! + 4 \times 2!)7!$$ if the ##a,b## are adjacent we have ##2!## spots for them and then ##2!## spots for them and the ##c##. this then leaves us with ##2## spots for the ##d## to still touch the ##a,b##.
After placing the c, I only see one spot for d to go to touch one of a, b.
we also have the situation where the ##a,b## are not adjacent, and the ##c## is in the middle. thus, there are ##2!## ways to arrange the ##a,b## around the ##c##. however, there are now ##4## spots we can place the ##d##.
I only see two for the d.
Placing d must not disrupt the existing assumed adjacencies.
 
haruspex said:
After placing the c, I only see one spot for d to go to touch one of a, b.
Abdc
Badc
Dabc
Dbac
Cabd
Cbad
Cdab
Cdba

I think there's 8, right?
 
joshmccraney said:
Abdc
Your 3!8! counts only cases where a, b, c form an adjacent triple. Abdc is not one of those, so it doesn't need to be subtracted.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
haruspex said:
Your 3!8! counts only cases where a, b, c form an adjacent triple. Abdc is not one of those, so it doesn't need to be subtracted.
great call! i don't know how i missed this! just for completeness, is it $$3!8! - (2 \times 2! + 2 \times 2!)7!$$
thanks for your help!
 
joshmccraney said:
great call! i don't know how i missed this! just for completeness, is it $$3!8! - (2 \times 2! + 2 \times 2!)7!$$
thanks for your help!
Yep.
 
  • #10
Yes. That answer is correct.
 
  • #11
hmm. A soldier of me just reported that my name has been mentioned in this thread ##7\times## :approve:
Anyway,glad that you solved a question involving my name. :wink:
 
  • #12
It was anything but easy! Thank goodness for pf!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K