Perturbation effect on harmonic osclillator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fahmed6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic Perturbation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the perturbation effects on a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, particularly focusing on the integration process involved in calculating first and second order perturbations when an additional term, such as ax^3, is introduced to the Hamiltonian. Participants explore various approaches to handle the integration limits and the use of Hermite polynomials in the context of perturbation theory.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the integration limits when calculating perturbation effects for the ground state of a harmonic oscillator with an added ax^3 term.
  • Another participant suggests using integration limits from -∞ to +∞.
  • A participant warns about complications arising from the potential tending to -∞ at large negative x, which affects the positivity of the Hamiltonian.
  • Questions arise regarding the treatment of Hermite polynomials when seeking a general solution for all energy states.
  • One participant proposes using raising and lowering operators in the energy basis as a more convenient method for perturbation theory, noting that it simplifies calculations and avoids certain complications.
  • A later reply confirms that using raising and lowering operators resolved the initial participant's problem.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of avoiding the position/momentum space basis for quantum simple harmonic oscillator calculations, advocating for the energy basis instead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to take for perturbation theory, with some advocating for the use of raising and lowering operators while others raise concerns about integration limits and the implications of the potential. No consensus is reached on a single method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential complications related to the Hamiltonian's positivity and the integration limits, indicating that these factors may depend on specific assumptions or definitions that are not fully resolved in the discussion.

fahmed6
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Im confused about taking out the first and second order perturbation effect on a 1d harmonic oscillator.I get to the integration part but don't know where to go from there.

for example if a term of ax^3 is added to the hamiltonian of the harmonic oscillator this is how i start.if i want to take out the result for the ground state i take the square of the wave function for the ground state, multiply it by ax^3 and integrate it.

But now i don't know what the integration limits should be.

Also if i want to find a general solution for all energy states then how should i put in the hermiye polynials as the are a function of x too and I am integating wrt x too.

Thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
have you tried x from -inf to +inf ?

And perhaps posting this in Home work forums?

But don't make a new one, a moderator will move this.
 
You should be careful with perturbation ax^3 and integration limits. This potential tends to [itex]- \infty[/itex] at large negative x. So the Hamiltonian becomes not positive-definite with various complications that follow.

Eugene.
 
what about the hermite polynimials.wat to do with them if i want a general solution.
 
Actually, far and away the best way to do perturbation theory of the harmonic oscillator is to use raising and lowering operators in the energy basis:

[tex]a|n\rangle=\sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle[/tex]
[tex]a^\dag|n\rangle=\sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle[/tex]
[tex]x\propto(a+a^\dag)[/tex]

and from the last equation, you can do any polynomial perturbation very easily (don't forget that they don't commute!). This also avoids the topological effects mentioned by meopemuk.
 
Thanks blechman.you r right.using raising and lowering operators is far more convenient and it solved my pblm.thanks a lot.
 
Glad I can help. Let me just close by saying for the benefit of anyone else reading this post: NEVER use the position/momentum space basis for a quantum SHO calculation! It is always easier to use the energy basis, or sometimes the coherent state basis, but never the position/momentum space basis. By following this rule of thumb, you will never have to do an integral, and you can always return to position space basis at the very end of the calculation if you are required to do so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K