Perturbation theory for solving a second-order ODE

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
Robin04
Messages
259
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
##\ddot{\xi}(t)=-b\xi (t)+\cos{(\omega t)}(a-c \xi^2(t))##, where ##a, b, c## are constants
Relevant Equations
-
I have to solve the equation above. I haven't heard about an exact method so I tried to apply perturbation theory. I don't know much about it so I would like to ask for some help.
First I put an ##\epsilon## in the coefficient of the non-linear ##\xi^2(t)## term:
##\ddot{\xi}(t)=-b\xi (t)+\cos{(\omega t)}(a-\epsilon c\xi^2(t))##
I calculated to the first order term and it was diverging. I heard that there are some methods that can help to sum a divergent series. Can you suggest any that can work here?
Also, next I tried to put ##\epsilon## in the exponent of the non-linear term, but when I substitute the series into the equation I don't know how to raise the series to the power ##\epsilon##.
So basically ##(\xi_0+\epsilon \xi_1+\epsilon^2 \xi_2+...)^{2 \epsilon}=?##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How sure are you that the equation reads $$\ddot{\xi} = -b\xi + \cos(\omega t)(a-c\xi^2)$$ and not instead $$\dot{\xi} = -b\xi + \cos(\omega t)(a-c\xi^2).$$ I only ask because the latter is an Ricatti equation and thus exactly solvable.

Robin04 said:
I calculated to the first order term and it was diverging. I heard that there are some methods that can help to sum a divergent series.

If you only have calculated the pertubation series upto first order, then how can the series be divergent if it is finite?
 
William Crawford said:
How sure are you that the equation reads
I'm sure, it is an equation of motion.
William Crawford said:
If you only have calculated the pertubation series upto first order, then how can the series be divergent if it is finite?
I meant it in the sense that this equation comes up as a part of an approximation method to a certain motion, and the unperturbed solution gives a much better approximation than with the first order term included, so I figured I don't have to go to second order.