Pf Photo Contest - Play It Again Sam (5/19-5/25)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contest Photo
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a photo contest where participants can resubmit previously entered photos that did not win First, Second, or Third place in prior contests. The scope includes contest rules, participant reactions, and the sharing of past entries, with an emphasis on the enjoyment of photography rather than competition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the contest allows for previously submitted photos that did not win, which some find exciting.
  • Another participant questions whether disqualified photos can be resubmitted, leading to a discussion about the rules.
  • Several participants express nostalgia for their past entries and hope for a second chance for their favorite photos.
  • There is a recognition that judging will be subjective due to the lack of a common theme for the submissions.
  • Some participants share their past entries and express uncertainty about their chances against other submissions.
  • Humor is present in the discussion, with participants making light of the competition and the rules.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the excitement of the contest format, but there are differing opinions on the inclusion of disqualified photos and the subjective nature of judging. The discussion remains unresolved regarding specific rules and the implications of past entries.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the contest rules, particularly regarding the submission of disqualified photos and the clarity of rule number nine. The discussion reflects a variety of interpretations and assumptions about the contest guidelines.

Who May Find This Useful

Members interested in photography, contest participation, and community engagement within the forum may find this discussion relevant.

  • #31
turbo-1 said:
You have unleashed the dogs of Hell, Woman! You can vainly attempt to call them back, now!
Wait, I'm a mentor, I can fix the polls and make it a tie for first place for all entries!

MUWAHAHAAA

:devil:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Evo said:
Wait, I'm a mentor, I can fix the polls and make it a tie for first place for all entries!

MUWAHAHAAA

:devil:
I can "fix" your amendment, make it disappear in all browsers, and make it appear that alternate options display. Play nice, or join Angela Bennet.
 
  • #33
turbo-1 said:
I can "fix" your amendment, make it disappear in all browsers, and make it appear that alternate options display. Play nice, or join Angela Bennet.
I couldn't really do it, I'm not an evil mentor.

<lying through her teeth to intentionally mislead turbo-1>

:rolleyes:
 
  • #34
Evo said:
I couldn't really do it, I'm not an evil mentor.

<lying through her teeth to intentionally mislead turbo-1>

:rolleyes:
I heard that remark! There are some killer pictures that didn't even place in final polling, and I think we can expect some really tough choices in the vote, here.
 
  • #35
CNV00023.jpg

Submitted for the straight and narrow compo.

I was going to submit my entry for sunrise-sunset but it turns out i got 2nd for that. When did that happen? :confused:
 
  • #36
Only two days left to submit a photo!