PF Remote Viewing Test: Object Revealed Any Winner? P. 7

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a remote viewing test initiated by a forum member, Zero, who invites participants to describe a mystery object inside a bag filled with shipping peanuts. The first correct description wins a Physics Forum T-shirt. Participants engage with humor and skepticism, offering various guesses about the object, ranging from mundane items to whimsical suggestions. There is a notable debate about the validity and methodology of remote viewing, with some participants arguing that proper protocols should be followed for a legitimate test. Others express frustration over perceived mockery of the test, emphasizing the need for serious engagement with the topic. The conversation also touches on the complexities of remote viewing as a practice, including the influence of personal skill and the importance of double-blind procedures. Overall, the thread highlights a mix of playful speculation and serious inquiry into the nature of remote viewing and its potential validity.

Check the options that best describe the dominant appearance of the object

  • Box

    Votes: 1 7.1%
  • Ellipsoidal / Spherical

    Votes: 2 14.3%
  • Cylindrical / tubular

    Votes: 3 21.4%
  • Segmented

    Votes: 1 7.1%
  • Disk / Planar

    Votes: 4 28.6%
  • Opaque

    Votes: 2 14.3%
  • Clear

    Votes: 1 7.1%
  • Bright colors

    Votes: 2 14.3%
  • Dark colors

    Votes: 4 28.6%
  • White

    Votes: 3 21.4%

  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .
  • #101
You, or the person(s) or device used to package the object in a bag, are that object, (assuming that is, that it can be proven that there is a bag), if you were me. That object would be me. If you had sealed the bag shut and had not otherwise been provided with an atmosphere, you would also be dead. You are buying yourself a T-shirt. The object is yourself. Or myself. See Special Relativity.

I would rather have the million dollars. I could pay all of my bills and buy all of the T-shirts I needed, as well as hand out a free T-shirt to at least 1,000 people.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
remote control for a mechanical system?

well my guess may be dumb or crazy, ingnorant, stupid, inferior or lazy, but a black platic bag is what I would use.
 
  • #103
Damn. It's been so long that I've forgotten what I voted it to be. By my psychic powers tell me it's "Disk/Planar".
 
  • #104


Ah, cool there was a thread for this and it was just hidden away. I should learn to search for things before posting about them. =]

I'm very interested in setting up a test, and I'm relatively new to this site, so no one knows me.

The thing I have a problem with though, is that only the person that creates the test could know whether or not there was corruption in the validity of the experiment. The harshest of skeptics would still say that RV isn't real, and the only way to prove it to them, is for them to set up the test themselves. So, what is the perfect test of RV to prove it to yourself?

Also, make sure that people are actually researching Remote Viewing and figuring out its complexities, Anyone that just reads the post for the test and does no research on the subject wouldn't know how much interference can affect whether you're able to see the target.
 
  • #105


I think that to reduce the effect of knowing the person's tendencies, the next version of the RV test should involve the judge choosing an unnamed 3rd party to select the object.
 
  • #106


Or just make it double blind so that know one knows until its revealed.
 
  • #107


Is it a dark coloured sweater/blanket?
 
  • #108


its already been revealed, another test coming soon depending on interest
 

Similar threads

Back
Top