PF Style 2026

[QuarkyMeson]

only two points:
How do you mean, "tag lines"?

What in other wording can you say for "anti-LLM"?

I am not really complaining. Just interested in what you meant.

Even complaining is fine.

So for example here, when I was logging in, you're hit with what I would call "taglines"; i.e. "science by humans", "human vetted guidance ... ", "an answer is easy ..." , etc.

One tagline, imo, would be fine, but here there are several and it kind of just overloads someone landing on the page. Also, most of these are clearly anti-LLM sentiment, and while I understand and hate "LLM physics" that dominates places like LinkedIn, it just felt like too much and the forum was trying to stand as a clear alternative to LLMs when it could/should stand on it's own.

If that all makes sense. Again, just one mans opinion.

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

If that all makes sense. Again, just one mans opinion.

It does and we will likely moderate in the near future. For now, we're not standing on our own very well. Chat search has greatly harmed participation, so we must make it very clear what our differentiation is and value prop.

 

[symbolipoint]

#151, QuarkyMeson
The post still seems unfocused but in trying to interpret, I feel like you and I and hopefully others want the forum structure to be more easily found, and want actual members participating. Such as I try to interpret make sense.

 

[Dale]

I wanted to get a few days experience before forming an opinion. I use primarily the dark mode on a mobile device, and I really like the new UI. I like the organization of the front page and feel like it encourages my activity in forums that I typically don’t visit.