PH of a mixed solution: is this right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter N_L_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixed Ph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the final pH of a solution created by mixing 200 ml of 0.400 M NH3 with 300 ml of 0.100 M HCl. The initial calculation using an ICE table resulted in a pH of 9.68, prompting questions about the correctness of this approach. Participants suggest that using two ICE tables may be necessary to account for the reactions in both directions, depending on which component is in excess. The hint provided indicates that if HCl is in excess, the pH can be calculated directly using the pH equation, while if NH3 is in excess, the Kb equation should be applied. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the limiting reactant to determine the final pH accurately.
N_L_
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the final pH of a solution obtained by mixing 200 ml of 0.400 M NH3 with 300 ml of 0.100 M HCl? (Kb = 1.8 x 10^-5)

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I used an ICE table and came up with 9.68. Is that correct?

Should I have used two ICE tables instead of one? The first in the one direction and the second going back in the other direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hint: the first reactions is that with NH3 and HCl, if you have excess HCl, then you can simply use the pH equation (pH= -log[H3O+]) to find the resulting pH, if the base is the excess, then the Kb equation is going to be used to determine the [OH-] concentration, and eventually the pH.
 
Thank you.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top